Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec;97(12):2276–2280. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092684

TABLE 3—

Results of Linear Regression Analyses for Assaults Against Women: Diadema, Brazil, July 2000–July 2005

No Time Trend Linear Time Trend
Intercept, r (t) −3.402** (−2.985) 484.459** (2.882)
Linear time trend, years (t) −0.244** (−2.903)
Unemployment rate, % (t) 0.075 (1.181) 0.057 (1.060)
New closing time law, r (t) −0.822*** (−4.737) −0.189 (−0.709)
ρ (t) 0.416*** (3.544) 0.304* (2.476)
R2 0.487 0.581
Simulation impact of new law
    Assaults prevented in 3 years, no. 1050.6 175.8
    Assaults prevented, % 56.1 17.2
    95% Lower bound on assaults prevented 680.0 −238.6
    95% Upper bound on assaults prevented 1421.2 590.2

Note. Linear regression analyses related log-transformed crime rates per 1000 population to untransformed exogenous measures using monthly data from July 2000 to July 2005 (N = 61 months). Models included generalized least squares correction for first-order autocorrelated residuals (Prais—Winsten algorithm). The new closing time law was coded as a dummy variable.

* P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 (2-tailed tests).