TABLE 3—
No Time Trend | Linear Time Trend | |
Intercept, r (t) | −3.402** (−2.985) | 484.459** (2.882) |
Linear time trend, years (t) | −0.244** (−2.903) | |
Unemployment rate, % (t) | 0.075 (1.181) | 0.057 (1.060) |
New closing time law, r (t) | −0.822*** (−4.737) | −0.189 (−0.709) |
ρ (t) | 0.416*** (3.544) | 0.304* (2.476) |
R2 | 0.487 | 0.581 |
Simulation impact of new law | ||
Assaults prevented in 3 years, no. | 1050.6 | 175.8 |
Assaults prevented, % | 56.1 | 17.2 |
95% Lower bound on assaults prevented | 680.0 | −238.6 |
95% Upper bound on assaults prevented | 1421.2 | 590.2 |
Note. Linear regression analyses related log-transformed crime rates per 1000 population to untransformed exogenous measures using monthly data from July 2000 to July 2005 (N = 61 months). Models included generalized least squares correction for first-order autocorrelated residuals (Prais—Winsten algorithm). The new closing time law was coded as a dummy variable.
* P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 (2-tailed tests).