TABLE 3—
Random Effects Variances From the Mixed Models for the Effect of Covariates on the Odds of Experiencing Financial Stress Among Ever Smokers (N = 5699): Waves 1–4, the Household and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey , 2002–2005
Model 1, variance (SE)a | P | Model 2, variance (SE)b | P | Model 3, variance (SE)c | P | |
Collection district-level intercept (SE) | 0.147 (0.024) | < .001 | 0.115 (0.023) | < .001 | 0.119 (0.023) | < .001 |
Participant-level intercept (SE) | 1.917 (0.051) | < .001 | 1.970 (0.055) | < .001 | 2.534 (0.194) | < .001 |
Measurement occasion–level variance (SE) | 0.476 (0.006) | < .001 | 0.523 (0.007) | < .001 | 0.472 (0.008) | < .001 |
Measurement occasion–level slopes | ||||||
Time | 0.137 (0.016) | < .001 | ||||
Occupationd | 0.119 (0.023) | < .005 | ||||
Blue collar | −0.029 (0.262) | |||||
White collar | 1.109 (0.332) | |||||
Professional | 0.275 (0.269) |
aModel 1 included all occasion-level covariates, and the intercept (i.e., adjusted proportion of smokers experiencing financial stress or mean of material well-being) varied by participant and collection district.
bModel 2 added participant-level covariates to model 1.
cModel 3 built on model 2, because the effect of occasion-level covariates varied by participant (i.e., we allowed for level-2 random slopes). The full model included the slopes for which there was moderate evidence (P < .01) that they varied by participant.
dBlue-collar workers included people in trades, production and transport, and laborers; white-collar workers were clerical, service, and sales people; professionals were defined as managers, administrators, and associated professionals.