Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 21;63(7):461–468. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020032

Table 2 Baseline measurements of whole‐body vibration (WBV) questionnaires, mean (SD), differences non‐significant if not stated otherwise.

Experimental group Control group 95% CI for difference
OHS professionals (n = 18) (n = 11)
OHS size: serving <20 000 employees 15% 17%
Knowledge on WBV (0 to 22) 12.5 (3.0) 13.7 (2.9) (−1.2 to 3.5)
Attitude (−36 to +36) 12.1 (6.1) 8.2 (8.2) (−10.2 to 2.5)
 OHS can play important role in prevention of effects of WBV (agree) 44% 45%
Plant managers (n = 12) (n = 10)
Knowledge on WBV (0 to 12) 9.8 (1.3) 10.8 (0.8) (0.1 to 1.9)*
General company policy onhealth and safety (0 to 4) 2.3 (1.0) 2.1 (1.0) (−1.0 to 0.7)
 Written annual health and safety plan available? (yes) 75% 90%
Company policy on WBV (0 to 11) 4.9 (2.2) 5.2 (1.6) (−1.4 to 1.9)
 Attention for WBV is included in the annual health and safety plan (yes) 17% 30%
Forklift drivers (n = 158) (n = 76)
Mean age (years) 36.9 (10.1) 36.7 (9.0) (−2.8 to 2.4)
Lower vocational education (%) 68% 72%
Experience on the truck (years) 8.1 (7.7) 10.1 (7.6) (−0.1 to 4.1)
Knowledge on WBV (0 to 22) 15.7 (3.0) 15.8 (2.6) (−0.7 to 0.8)
 Driving fast leads to higher vibration level (yes) 92% 88%
Attitude on WBV (−42 to +42) 13.1 (10.0) 14.9 (10.0) (−1.0 to 4.7)
 Driving fast is inevitable (agree) 50% 47%
Actual behaviour on WBV (−33 to +33) 2.8 (9.1) 1.2 (9.3) (−4.4 to 1.1)
 I adjust my seat (often or always) 77% 72%
 My driving speed is fast (idem) 68% 72%
 I pay attention to surface conditions 49% 50%
Locus of control (−50 to +50) 31.6 (5.9) 32.2 (7.5) (−1.4 to 2.6)

*Two‐tailed t test, p = 0.04.