Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 21;63(7):461–468. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020032

Table 7 Results of analyses of variance of the relation between gain scores of intermediate objectives and change in whole‐body vibration (WBV) exposure level; mean levels and standard deviations of WBV change (post–pre) per tertile of the intermediary objective.

n First tertile Second tertile Third tertile F value p Value
Knowledge of OH 16 0.10±0.26 −0.01±0.09 −0.17±0.11 4.81 0.047
Knowledge of OP 10 0.11±0.24 −0.17±0.11 −0.03±0.08 1.02 0.344
Company policy on WBV 13 0.06±0.22 −0.03±0.23 0.09±0.22 0.04 0.853
Attitude of drivers 69 −0.02±0.19 0.00±0.26 −0.04±0.29 0.06 0.803
Actual behaviour of drivers 74 −0.05±0.28 −0.01±0.25 0.01±0.22 0.84 0.364
Intended behaviour 70 0.04±0.19 −0.02±0.16 −0.03±0.28 1.1 0.290
Risk control score* 110 0.01±0.32 −0.09±0.27 −0.26±0.62 5.4 0.022

*For this variable we did not use tertiles but the actual score (respectively 0, 1, 2).