Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 15;64(1):8–16. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.028241

Table 3 Results of regression models for particulate matter with a 50% cut‐off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm (PM2.5), PM2.5 absorbance and nitrogen dioxide.

Variable Slope Standard error Sequential R2
Model for PM2.5 0.358
 Land coverage factor (100–250 m) 2.56570 0.896 0.167
 Length of rural roads (100–250 m) 0.847×10−3 0.364×10−3 0.144
 Distance to nearest motorway −0.22740×10−3 0.273×10−3 0.013
 Population density (500–1000 m) 0.10374×10−3 0.752×10−4 0.035
Model for PM2.5 absorbance 0.420
 Household density (2500–5000 m) 4.58×10−5 2.68×10−6 0.249
 Distance to nearest federal roads −1.322×10−4 5.855×10−5 0.069
 Land coverage factor (100–250 m) 0.464 0.223 0.060
 Length of county roads (0–1000 m) 5.500×10−4 4.984×10−4 0.041
Model for NO2 0.510
 Length of state roads (1000–2500 m) 6.171×10−4 5.661×10−4 0.327
 Land coverage factor (100–250 m) 8.821 3.772 0.084
 Land coverage class −3.447 2.444 0.059
 Household density (2500–5000 m) 5.997×10−5 4.152×10−5 0.032
 Length of rural roads (250–500 m) 5.457×10−4 7.671×10−4 0.008

NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PM2.5, particulate matter with a 50% cut‐off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm.