Table 3.
Ten subjects
|
Eight subjects
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | Residual errors | t-Test | R2 | Residual errors | t-Test | |
(a) Based on all conditions | ||||||
Model 1 | 0.66 | 11.40 | – | 0.70 | 8.94 | – |
Model 2: Model 1 plus Tv | 0.67 | 11.07 | bb | 0.74 | 8.45 | bbb |
Model 3: Model 1 plus Hv | 0.66 | 11.29 | (b) | 0.71 | 8.77 | b |
Model 4: Model 1 plus Td | 0.66 | 11.35 | ns | 0.71 | 8.92 | ns |
Model 5: Model 1 plus Tv and Hv | 0.68 | 10.75 | bbb | 0.76 | 8.02 | bbb |
Model 6: Model 1 plus Tv, Hv, and Td | 0.69 | 10.61 | bbb | 0.76 | 7.95 | bbb |
(b) Based on TV-HV condition only | ||||||
Model 1 | 0.74 | 11.74 | – | 0.85 | 6.13 | – |
Model 4: Model 1 plus Td | 0.75 | 11.18 | c | 0.88 | 5.75 | (c) |
(c) Based on each condition separatelya | ||||||
Model 1 | – | 9.85 | ddd | – | 7.31 | ddd |
Tv target visibility condition, Hv hand visibility condition, Td target direction condition
Residual errors are calculated for each condition separately and then all residual errors are pooled together across all conditions
P < 0.001,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.05,
0.05 < P < 0.1; ns not significant for a comparison of residual errors from Model 1 in the section (a)
P < 0.05,
0.05 < P < 0.1 for a comparison of residual errors from Model 1 in the section (b)
P < 0.001 for a comparison of residual errors from Model 6 in the section (a)