Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 26.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2007 May 3;181(3):447–460. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0945-9

Table 3.

R2 values and mean absolute residual errors across all trials of all subjects for each model

Ten subjects
Eight subjects
R2 Residual errors t-Test R2 Residual errors t-Test
(a) Based on all conditions
Model 1 0.66 11.40 0.70 8.94
Model 2: Model 1 plus Tv 0.67 11.07 bb 0.74 8.45 bbb
Model 3: Model 1 plus Hv 0.66 11.29 (b) 0.71 8.77 b
Model 4: Model 1 plus Td 0.66 11.35 ns 0.71 8.92 ns
Model 5: Model 1 plus Tv and Hv 0.68 10.75 bbb 0.76 8.02 bbb
Model 6: Model 1 plus Tv, Hv, and Td 0.69 10.61 bbb 0.76 7.95 bbb
(b) Based on TV-HV condition only
Model 1 0.74 11.74 0.85 6.13
Model 4: Model 1 plus Td 0.75 11.18 c 0.88 5.75 (c)
(c) Based on each condition separatelya
Model 1 9.85 ddd 7.31 ddd

Tv target visibility condition, Hv hand visibility condition, Td target direction condition

a

Residual errors are calculated for each condition separately and then all residual errors are pooled together across all conditions

bbb

P < 0.001,

bb

P < 0.01,

b

P < 0.05,

(b)

0.05 < P < 0.1; ns not significant for a comparison of residual errors from Model 1 in the section (a)

c

P < 0.05,

(c)

0.05 < P < 0.1 for a comparison of residual errors from Model 1 in the section (b)

ddd

P < 0.001 for a comparison of residual errors from Model 6 in the section (a)