Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov;5(6):519–527. doi: 10.1370/afm.751

1.

Differences Between Women by 11-Week Interview Status1*

Variables Full Interview n=661 Mean (SD) Mini-Interview n=70 Mean (SD) Incomplete or No Interview n=86 Mean (SD) Significance of F Test Using ANOVA or t Test(P Value)
Continuous
Age, years 30 (5.3) 28.4 (5.6) 27.9 (5.8) F = 7.86 (.000)
Preconception general health score 3.1 (0.8) 3.0 (0.7) 3.0 (0.9) NS
Postpartum health at 11 weeks
    Mental health (MCS) score 50.4 (7.3) 50.3 (8.3) NS
    Physical health (PCS) score 55.7 (5.2) 54.5 (8.7) NS
Discrete Frequency (%) Frequency (%) Frequency (%)
White 568 (86) 49 (70) 64 (74) χ2 = 17.1; df 2 (.000)
Earned a college degree 318 (48) 18 (26) 18 (21) χ2 = 32.6; df 2 (.000)
Meets poverty threshold 81 (12) 10 (14) 17 (20) NS
Prenatal mood problems 307 (46) 36 (51) 42 (49) NS
Primiparous 301 (46) 31 (44) 38 (44) NS
Employment (11 weeks)
    Unemployed 0 40 (57) NS2
    On leave 334 (51) 11 (16)
    Working 327 (49) 19 (27)

MCS = mental component summary from the SF-12; PCS = physicial component summary from the SF-12.

Note: Variables not significantly different between all 3 groups included the proportion of women by marital status, primiparous, and those who had cesarean deliveries; these findings are not reported in the table for purposes of brevity.

* The dashes indicate that no data was available for the subjects at the relevant time period because they did not do an interview at 5 and or 11 weeks after childbirth.

The t test was used to evaluate differences in mean MCS and PCS scores between women completing the full interview and those completing the mini interview.

The χ2 test was used to evaluate the difference in status as at work or on leave among employed women by interview status as full vs mini-interview. Women completing the mini-interview because they were unemployed were excluded from the analysis.