Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov;91(11):1440–1444. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.120162

Table 3 Familial relations of myopia in multivariable regression using GEE2 method for different definitions of myopia.

Manifest refraction Cycloplegic refraction
Adjusted OR* (CI 95%) λR Adjusted OR (CI 95%) λR
Myopia ⩽−0.5 D
 Sibling–sibling 3.42 (1.99 to 5.81) 2.09 4.35 (1.97 to 9.58) 2.58
 Parent–offspring 2.56 (1.88 to 3.49) 1.82 2.80 (1.88 to 4.22) 2.05
 Spouse 0.79 (0.51 to 1.22) 0.84 0.68 (0.38 to 1.23) 0.73
Myopia ⩽−1 D
 Sibling–sibling 3.93 (2.16 to 7.10) 2.67 3.25 (1.75 to 5.99) 2.46
 Parent–offspring 3.03 (2.09 to 4.35) 2.26 3.22 (2.09 to 4.95) 2.45
 Spouse 0.99 (0.57 to 1.75) 0.99 1.19 (0.59 to 2.34) 1.15
Myopia ⩽−2 D
 Sibling–sibling 4.39 (2.20 to 8.76) 3.32 5.31 (2.43 to 11.59) 3.86
 Parent–offspring 3.53 (2.18 to 5.75) 2.84 5.21 (3.03 to 9.03) 3.81
 Spouse 0.87 (0.35 to 2.18) 0.88 1.02 (0.35 to 3.03) 1.02

*All models were adjusted for age, sex, years of education, and height as possible confounding variables (data not shown).

CI, confidence interval; GEE2, second order generalised estimating equations; OR, odds ratio.