Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 20;60(12):1307–1312. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040634

Table 1 Differential diagnosis of columnar cell change, columnar cell hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Feature CCC CCH FEA ADH
Cell morphology Columnar Columnar Columnar and/or cuboidal Cuboidal
Number of cell layers ⩽2 >2 Variable Variable
Architecture Flat Tufts/mounds Flat or tufts/mounds. Not complex* Complex architectural pattern*
Nuclear atypia† Absent Absent Present Present
Nuclear features† Ovoid, bland, polarised nuclei arranged perpendicular to basement membrane Ovoid, bland; some nuclear crowding and overlapping of nuclei may be observed. Nuclei arranged perpendicular to basement membrane In typical form: round, uniform, evenly‐spaced with finely dispersed chromatin, as in low grade DCIS. Alternatively may show more “classical” cytonuclear atypia in the form of enlarged, more oval nuclei with mild to moderate pleomorphism; some clumping of chromatin may be seen Round and evenly spaced as in low grade DCIS; finely dispersed chromatin
Nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio Normal Normal Increased Increased
Internal contours of acini Irregular Irregular Typically smooth Variable

ADH, atypical ductal hyperplasia; CCC, columnar cell change; CCH, columnar cell hyperplasia; FEA, flat epithelial atypia; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ.

*True micropapillae (with bulbous tip extending into the lumen from a narrower stalk) or sieve‐like cribriform spaces.

†Cases with high grade nuclear atypia should be classified as flat high grade DCIS and do not fall within either the spectrum of FEA or of ADH.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure