Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;50(1):18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2007.03.001

Table 1.

Summery of reported cardiac stem/progenitor cells

Surface Markers Gene Expression Self renewal In-vitro differentiation In-vivo differentiation Species Reference
SP Sca-1+, CD31+, CD34 -, c-kit-*, CD45-, Isl1- Nkx2.5, GATA4, MEF2C, Tie2 Yes CM, CE, SMC CM, EC Mice, pig, human Hierlihy et al 2002 18
Pfister et al 2005 15
Mouquet et al 2005 49
Martin et al 2004 13
Messina et al 2003 14
c-kit Sca-1+, SP+** Lin-, CD45-, CD31-, CD34- Nkx2.5, GATA4, MEF2C Yes CM, EC, SMC CM, EC, SMC Mice, rat, dog, pig, human, Urbanek et al 2003 107
Beltrami et al 2003 12
Linke et al 2005 108
Sca-1 CD31+, CD34- Lin-, CD45-, c-kit-*** Nkx2.5***, GATA4, MEF2C, Tie2 ND CM CM Mice, dog Oh et al 2003 19
Matsuura et al 2004 109
Isl-1 Lin-, CD45-, c-kit-, CD34-, CD31-, SP- Nkx2.5, GATA4 Yes CM ND Mice, rat, human Laugwitz et al 2005 20

CM: cardiomyocyte. EC: endothelial cell. SMC: smooth muscle cell. ND: not determined

*

C-kit might be cleaved by cardiac tissue enzymatic digestion. Martin et al found no expression of CD31, while Pfister et al reported two sub populations of CD31+ and CD31- among CSP. These differences may due to slight variation in isolation procedures used between groups.

**

SP phenotype was not addressed through Hoechst exclusion but through MDR-1 expression.

***

Matsuura et al reported 40% and 10% of Sca-1 cells expressing CD45 and CD34, respectively.