Table 2.
Study | Method of delivery | Patients treated/ control | Placebo/ control | Cell type Cell number or Dose | Time of cell delivery (days post-MI) | Results | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strauer | Intracoronary | 10/10 30 (CPC) | control | BM-MNC 9 × 106 to 2.8 × 107 CPC |
7 | Improved contractility and reduced infarct size | Strauer et al 2002 110 |
TOPCARE-AMI | Intracoronary | 29 (BM-MNC) | N/A | 1.3 × 107 BM-MNC 2.4 × 108 |
3 to 7 | Improved EF and reduced infarct size | Assmus et al 2002 111 Britten et al 2003 112 Schachinger et al 2004 113 |
BOOST | Intracoronary | 30/30 | control | BM-MNC 24 × 109 |
6 | Improved EF at 6 months No difference at 18 months |
Wollert et al 2004 100 Meyer et al 2006 101 |
Janssens | Intracoronary | 33/34 | placebo | BM-MNC 3.0 × 108 cells |
1 | No effect | Janssens et al 2006 114 |
Chen | Intracoronary | 34/35 | placebo | MSC 48 × 1010 to 60 × 1010 |
18 | Improved and perfusion at 3 months | Chen et al 2004 115 |
REPAIR-AMI | Intracoronary | 102/102 | placebo | BM-MNC 2.4 × 108 |
4 | Improved EF and reduced infarct size at 4 months | Schachinger et al 2006 103 |
ASTAMI | Intracoronary | 100 | control | BM-MNC 8.7 × 107 |
5 to 8 | No difference at 6 months | Lunde et al 2006 102 |
FIRSTLINE-AMI | Mobilization | 25/25 | control | G-CSF 10μg/Kg BW |
0 to 6 1QD |
Improved EF and remodeling at 4 months | Ince et al. 2005 104 |
STEMMI | Mobilization | 39/39 | placebo | G-CSF 10μg/Kg BW |
0 to 6 1QD |
No difference at 6 months | Ripa et al 2006 106 |
REVIVAL II | Mobilization | 56/58 | placebo | G-CSF 10μg/Kg BW |
0 to 5 1QD |
No difference at 6 months | Zohlnhoefer et al 2006 105 |
BM-MNC: unfractionated bone marrow mononuclear cells; CPC: Circulating progenitor cells; MSC: mesenchymal stem cells; 1QD: one subcutaneous G-CSF injection per day; EF: left ventricular ejection fraction.