Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 24;93(12):4209–4224. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.104794

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Cd2+ has no effect on the development of IUS but selectively hastens the time course of recovery. To examine which phase of the inactivation process was modulated by Cd2+, the application of Cd2+ was restricted to either the development or the recovery process. (A) Selective application of Cd2+ during development of IUS. Time course of peak inward sodium currents during a typical experiment (voltage clamp protocol as in Fig. 2 C). Superfusion with Cd2+ was started 100 s before the conditioning prepulse to allow for steady-state Cd2+ concentrations to be established at the beginning of the conditioning prepulse. Exposure to Cd2+ was terminated 180 s before the end of the conditioning prepulse to allow for complete washout of Cd2+ before initiation of recovery. (B) Normalized time course of recovery. Four experiments as described in A. Data points were fitted by Eq. 5, yielding the following parameters: IUS (drug free: A2 = 0.58 ± 0.02, τ2 = 163 ± 6, n = 6; Cd2+: A2 = 0.59 ± 0.03, τ2 = 158 ± 4 (n.s.), n = 4). (C) Selective application of Cd2+ during recovery from IUS. Time course of peak inward sodium currents during a typical experiment (voltage clamp protocol as in Fig. 2 C). Superfusion with Cd2+ was started 120 s before the end of the conditioning prepulse to allow the bath concentration of Cd2+ to reach steady state at the time of the start of the recovery period. (D) Normalized time course of recovery. Four experiments as described in C. Data points were fitted to Eq. 5, yielding the following parameters: drug free: A2 = 0.68 ± 0.04, τ2 = 120.0 ± 5.9; Cd2+: A2 = 0.64 ± 0.03 (P < 0.05), τ2 = 64.2 ± 3.8 s, (P < 0.05).