Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 12;7:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-7-66

Table 2.

Effect of mutations predicted by molecular modeling on the activation of the sweet taste receptor by neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) and aspartame (ASP)

variant NHDC EC50 (mM) NHDC maximal signal (% of wt) ASP EC50 (mM) ASP maximal signal (% of wt)
wt 0.1 ± 0.06 100 1.3 ± 0.1 100
S620A2.57 1.3 ± 0.5 55 ± 80 1.2 ± 0.3 64 ± 4
V621L2.58 n.f. --- n.f. ---
V621I2.58 >1 60 ± 14 1.9 ± 0.4 61 ± 1
F624L2.61 >1 35 ± 70 1.4 ± 0.2 21 ± 4
Y699L4.60 0.7 ± 0.1 83 ± 40 1.6 ± 0.4 78 ± 9
Y699F4.60 0.6 ± 0.4 72 ± 17 1.2 ± 0.3 56 ± 2
T724L5.37 0.5 ± 0.3 58 ± 60 1.5 ± 0.2 69 ± 2
R725M5.38 1.3 ± 0.4 64 ± 14 1.5 ± 0.7 56 ± 1
S726A5.39 0.9 ± 0.3 60 ± 50 0.9 ± 0.3 50 ± 2
L800F7.38 0.2 ± 0.1 91 ± 70 1.2 ± 0.3 90 ± 1
C801I7.39 1.6 ± 0.7 70 ± 13 1.2 ± 0.5 50 ± 9
C801L7.39 n.f. --- n.f. ---
G804A7.42 1.3 ± 0.5 53 ± 10 1.6 ± 0.2 44 ± 1
G804V7.42 n.r. --- 1.3 ± 0.3 21 ± 2

Receptor variants that affect the NHDC response are shown in bold. Values are given as average over at least three independent experiments ± SD. n.f. no response to any tested sweetener, n.r. no response to neohesperidin dihydrochalcone up to highest tested concentration (6 mM), but responses to other sweeteners. (>), EC50 not calculable because saturation is not reached (Additional file 2).