Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2007 Jul 19;40(15):3381–3388. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.008

Table 2.

Comparison of techniques (constant, linear, power law, and no correction) used for correcting measured values of modulus and yield stress. Percent error and paired t-test are calculated for corrected vs. true (side-artifact-free) values. Slope (m), intercept (b), and coefficient of determination (R2) are reported for the linear regression of true vs. corrected values.

Correction Technique Anatomic Site Measure (MPa) Percent Error (mean ± S.D.) p-value (paired t-test) Linear fit: (vs. True values)
m b R2
None Pooled E −15.9 ± 6.7 < 0.001 1.04 85.8 > 0.99
σy −20.9 ± 9.1 < 0.001 1.10 0.6 0.99
VB E −18.8 ± 5.5 < 0.001 1.12 49.2 0.99
σy −23.0 ± 9.0 < 0.001 1.14 0.4 0.96
FN E −8.8 ± 3.2 < 0.001 1.03 90.8 > 0.99
σy −15.8 ± 7.1 < 0.001 1.07 0.8 0.99

Constant Pooled E 0.4 ± 6.0 0.11 0.97 15.4 > 0.99
σy 1.3 ± 10.9 0.09 0.93 0.2 0.99
VB E 0.5 ± 6.8 0.15 0.90 49.2 0.99
σy 1.5 ± 11.9 0.17 0.87 0.4 0.96
FN E 0.1 ± 3.5 0.47 0.94 90.8 > 0.99
σy 0.7 ± 8.5 0.33 0.90 0.8 0.99

Linear Pooled E 0.8 ± 5.5 0.28 0.99 −1.6 > 0.99
σy 1.0 ± 10.3 0.52 0.98 0.0 > 0.99
VB E 0.4 ± 6.1 0.67 0.98 7.5 0.98
σy 1.4 ± 11.4 0.45 0.93 0.2 0.95
FN E 1.7 ± 3.3 0.28 1.02 −56.8 0.99
σy 0.0 ± 7.4 0.92 0.98 0.2 0.98

Power Pooled E 0.3 ± 5.2 0.42 0.98 13.7 > 0.99
σy 0.6 ± 10.0 0.57 0.97 0.1 0.99
VB E 0.3 ± 6.0 0.68 1.01 −3.6 0.98
σy 0.8 ± 11.1 0.74 0.95 0.2 0.95
FN E 13.4 ± 5.8 0.06 0.98 0.5 > 0.99
σy 0.1 ± 7.5 0.65 0.95 0.5 0.99