Table 3.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of reporting poor health
| OR | 95% CI | p | |
| Model 1: Socio-demographics (1) | |||
| Gender (female) | |||
| Male | 1.10 | 0.99–1.21 | 0.075 |
| Age | 1.02 | 1.02–1.03 | <0.001 |
| Social class (I & II) | |||
| III NM | 1.07 | 0.93–1.24 | 0.352 |
| III M | 1.32 | 1.15–1.52 | <0.001 |
| IV & V | 1.40 | 1.23–1.60 | <0.001 |
| Other | 1.46 | 1.16–1.83 | 0.001 |
| Employment status (employed) | |||
| Unemployed | 1.45 | 1.10–1.90 | 0.008 |
| Retired | 2.32 | 2.01–2.68 | <0.001 |
| Disabled | 18.55 | 15.56–22.11 | <0.001 |
| Other | 1.51 | 1.27–1.80 | <0.001 |
| Household tenure (Homeowner) | |||
| Non-homeowner | 1.57 | 1.39–1.76 | <0.001 |
| Model 2a: Unadjusted (2 3) | |||
| Access to amenities | 1.13 | 1.08–1.19 | <0.001 |
| Neighbourhood quality | 1.33 | 1.27–1.39 | <0.001 |
| Neighbourhood disorder | 1.25 | 1.19–1.32 | <0.001 |
| Social cohesion | 1.14 | 1.08–1.20 | <0.001 |
| Deprivation | 1.35 | 1.29–1.42 | <0.001 |
| Model 2b: Adjusted for socio-demographics (2 3) | |||
| Access to amenities | 1.10 | 1.04–1.15 | <0.001 |
| Neighbourhood quality | 1.20 | 1.14–1.26 | <0.001 |
| Neighbourhood disorder | 1.13 | 1.07–1.19 | <0.001 |
| Social cohesion | 1.09 | 1.04–1.14 | <0.001 |
| Deprivation | 1.19 | 1.13–1.25 | <0.001 |
| Model 2c: Adjusted for socio-demographics and deprivation (23) | |||
| Access to amenities | 1.07 | 1.02–1.12 | 0.004 |
| Neighbourhood quality | 1.13 | 1.07–1.20 | <0.001 |
| Neighbourhood disorder | 1.05 | 1.00–1.11 | 0.059 |
| Social cohesion | 1.04 | 0.99–1.09 | 0.110 |
(1) Reference groups are given in brackets.
(2) The neighbourhood measures were included as z-scores, with higher values representing a more negative evaluation.
(3) The odds ratios are expressed for each SD increase.