Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2003 Aug;30(4):257–283. doi: 10.1023/a:1026142601822

Table V.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters between the Western and the Japanese analyses. The population estimates are reported along with the estimated interindividual variability expressed as CV in brackets, when it was estimated in the analysis. The parameter estimates for the Japanese analysis were reported in [9].

Compound Parameter Western analysis Japanese analysis
CDHP kabs,CDHP (hr−1) 1.2 (83%) 1.2(114%)
CLCDHP/F (L.hr−1) 6.2*BSA (34%) 10.9 (41%)
Vd,CDHP/F (L) 18.8*BSA (20%) 51.4 (29%)
FT kabs,FT (hr−1) 1.4 (103%) 0.9 (98%)
CLFT/F (L.hr−1) 2.9*BSA (31%) 1.2*BSA (40%)
Vd,FT/F (L) 16.0*BSA (27%) 13.8*BSA (19%)
5-FU CL0,5–FU/F (L.hr−1) 146*BSA (16%) 170*BSA (22%)
Vd,5–FU/F (L) 11.5*BSA(16%) 9.4*BSA (22%)
ki, (mg.L−1) 0.04 (−) 0.03 (−)
Oteracil kabs,oxo (hr−1) gastric: 2.1 (82%) 1.0,1.6 (71%)
other: 0.9 (82%) 0.5,0.8 (71%)
CLoxo/F (L.hr−1) gastric: 85*BSA (81%) 55.4*BSA,71.5*BSA (81%)
other: 163*BSA (81%) 101*BSA,130*BSA (81%)
Vd,oxo/F (L) gastric: 293*BSA (72%) 231*BSA,298*BSA (70%)
other: 561*BSA (72%) 419*BSA,541*BSA (70%)

the two values given for the parameters of oteracil in Japanese patients correspond to two groups with ages respectively over 65 and under 65.