Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;208(6):725–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00564.x

Table 3.

Maximum muscle moment arm as a percentage of either femur (hip and knee) or tibia (ankle) length

Muscle Pp Gp Gj Gm Oam Ojm Ojf Haf Pt Hs
Gluteus maximus at hip 19 24 12 20 10 10
Gluteus medius at hip  1  6 24 18  5
Ischiofemoralis at hip 23 47 19 21  7
Long head of biceps femoris at hip 24 30 25 25 37 18 25/16
Semitendinosus at hip 16 16 32 28 21 19 19
Semimembranosus at hip 24 16 31 33 21 19 19
Gracilis at hip 39 27 48 26 35
Adductor magnus at hip 26 25 22 10 27
Rectus femoris at hip 15  7  5 20 11  6 11 10/7
Long head of biceps femoris at knee 10  4 17  3  7  7  8  4 13 3/8§/7
Short head of biceps femoris at knee  9 14  9  3 11 11  4  9
Semitendinosus at knee 31 34 28 36 27 24 22 30 23§
Semimembranosus at knee 11 16 16  3 16  9  7  7  9 8§
Gracilis at knee 32 30 14 33 31 33 22 38
Vastus lateralis at knee 13 17  8  7  4 12  6  3  7 14/13§/10
Gastrocnemius medialis at knee  6  8  5  4 14 14  8  7 5/5
Gastrocnemius medialis II* at knee 14
Gastrocnemius lateralis at knee 10  6 12  2  1  6  8  2  6
Triceps surae at ankle 16 25 26 14 14 13 11 15 17 11
Flexor tibialis at ankle  6 17  3  5 10  6  4  4
Flexor fibularis at ankle  3  8 12  9  3  7  7
Tibialis anterior at ankle  9 11  7 10  4  8  3  4
Tibialis posterior  3  5  4  3  5
Extensor digitorum longus at ankle 11  6 10  7  7  9 12
Extensor hallucis longus at ankle 14 14 15 13 13 15
*

Gastrocnemius medialis had two heads in Ojf, see Results.

Pt data were taken directly from Thorpe et al. (1999).

Hs data were taken from Visser et al. (1990)

Thorpe et al. (1999). Raw moment arm data from Herzog & Read (1993) were divided by a hypothetical femur length of 40 cm (as published in Visser et al. 1990) in order to determine moment arm length as a percentage of femur length.