Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 29;61(10):895–902. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.057950

Table 2 Mean (SD) changes in FEV1 and FVC % predicted in the azithromycin and placebo groups during the study.

Azithromycin Placebo Azithromycin−placebo difference estimate (95% CI)
FEV1 % predicted (%)
Trend slope over the 12 months
 Total population −4.9 (2.0) −1.7 (2.0) −3.2 (−8.9 to 2.3), NS
 Patients not infected with PA −5.0 (2.5) −1.8 (2.4) −3.2 (−10.0 to 3.6), NS
 Patients infected with PA −4.1 (3.2) −1.2 (3.1) −2.9 (−11.7 to 5.8), NS
Relative change
 Total population −4.3 (17.9) −1.5 (15.4) −2.8 (−10.1 to 4.5), NS
 Patients not infected with PA −3.0 (19.3) −1.1 (13.5) −1.9 (−10.3 to 6.5), NS
 Patients infected with PA −8.7 (11.5) −2.7 (21.0) −6.0 (−22.7 to 10.7), NS
FVC % predicted (%)
Trend slope over the 12 months
 Total population −2.4 (1.7) −3.6 (1.7) 1.2 (−3.4 to 5.8), NS
 Patients not infected with PA −2.2 (1.9) −5.1 (1.9) 2.9 (−2.3 to 8.2), NS
 Patients infected with PA −3.2 (3.3) 2.2 (3.2) −5.4 (−14.5 to 3.7), NS
Relative change
 Total population −1.8 (13.6) −4.5 (12.1) 2.7 (−3.0 to 8.4), NS
 Patients not infected with PA −1.0 (13.3) −4.3 (9.2) 3.3 (−2.4 to 9.1), NS
 Patients infected with PA −4.3 (15.4) −4.9 (19.4) 1.0 (−16.6 to 17.6), NS

CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; NS, not significant; SD, standard deviation.

Sample sizes in the azithromycin and placebo groups were, respectively, 40 and 42 for the total population, 31 and 32 for patients not infected with PA, and 9 and 10 for patients infected with PA.