Table 1.
Construct | Surface staining | Cell–cell fusion
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BH8 | 89.6 | BK132 | RF | SBL6669 | ||
CXCR4 | +*† | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
CXCR2 | +‡ | − | − | − | − | − |
2444 | +*‡ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ |
2444b | +‡ | ++ | ++ | + | − | ++ |
4244 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
4424 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
4442 | +*† | + | + | ++ | ++ | + |
4222 | +† | − | − | − | − | − |
2242 | +‡ | + | + | ± | − | ND |
2224 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
2442 | +*‡ | + | + | ± | − | ND |
2442b | − | − | − | − | − | − |
4422 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
2244 | +‡ | − | + | − | − | + |
CXCR4-tail | +*† | +++ | +++ | ND | ND | ND |
CXCR4-NAA | +* | + | + | ND | + | ND |
Surface expression after transient expression in QT6 cells was determined by flow cytometry staining with 12G5, rabbit serum to the CXCR4 amino terminus, or 10G2. Fusion activity relative to wild-type CXCR4 was determined as in Figs. 2, 3, 4, with 66–100% = +++; 33–65% = ++; 10–33% = +; 5–10% = ±; 0–5% = −. Fusion results for coreceptors that functioned were the average of at least three experiments. ND, not determined.
12G5 stained cells expressing the indicated receptor.
Rabbit serum to the CXCR4 amino terminus stained cells expressing the indicated receptor.
10G2 stained cells expressing the indicated receptor.