Abstract
Fusion of apposed nuclear envelopes is frequently seen at telophase during postmitotic reorganization of the nucleus, but only rarely at other times in the cell cycle. We attempted to define an experimental system for studying changes in the nuclear envelope related to the cell cycle by varying the time of pronuclear apposition in fertilized Lytechinus variegatus eggs. This approach was based on the assumption that the period from fertilization to metaphase of the first cleavage division corresponds to the period from telophase to metaphase in the generalized cell cycle. The experimental approach used was to block the movement of the pronuclei with Colcemid and then to release this block at varying times after insemination by photochemically inactivating the Colcemid. The results show that apposed pronuclear envelopes can fuse from soon after insemination until the anticipated time of prometaphase. Fusion occurred in about 3 min as scored by light microscopy and this time did not vary significantly with the time after insemination. The potential for nuclear fusion is not restricted to pronuclei alone since diploid nuclei in binucleate cells could be fused using centrifugation in solutions of Colcemid to bring the nuclei into apposition. It is suggested that the potential for nuclear fusion is not necessarily related to the cell cycle and that modification of the nuclear envelope, possibly by association with chromatin or other fibrous material restricts nuclear fusion in most multinucleated cells.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (838.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ALLEN R. D. Fertilization and activation of sea urchin eggs in glass capillaries. I. Membrane elevation and nuclear movements in totally and partially fertilized eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):403–424. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90188-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aronson J., Inoué S. Reversal by light of the action of N-methyl N-desacetyl colchicine on mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BRIGGS R., GREEN E. U., KING T. J. An investigation of the capacity for cleavage and differentiation in Rana pipiens eggs lacking "functional" chromosomes. J Exp Zool. 1951 Apr;116(3):455–499. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401160307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding to sea urchin eggs and the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):535–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DETTLAFF T. A., NIKITINA L. A., STROEVA O. G. THE R OLE OF THE GERMINAL VESICLE IN OOECYTE MATURATION IN ANURANS AS REVEALED BY THE REMOVAL AND TRANSPLANTATION OF NUCLEI. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1964 Dec;12:851–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fansler B., Loeb L. A. Sea urchin nuclear DNA polymerase. II. Changing localization during early development. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Oct;57(2):305–310. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HINEGARDNER R. T., RAO B., FELDMAN D. E. THE DNA SYNTHETIC PERIOD DURING EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE SEA URCHIN EGG. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Oct;36:53–61. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris H., Watkins J. F., Ford C. E., Schoefl G. I. Artificial heterokaryons of animal cells from different species. J Cell Sci. 1966 Mar;1(1):1–30. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herzog V., Miller F. The localization of endogenous peroxidase in the lacrimal gland of the rat during postnatal development. Electron microscope cytochemical and biochemical studies. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jun;53(3):662–680. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.3.662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JENSEN W. A. OBSERVATIONS ON THE FUSION OF NUCLEI IN PLANTS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Dec;23:669–672. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins R. A. Fine structure of division in ciliate protozoa. I. Micronuclear mitosis in Blepharisma. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):463–481. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilarski W., Jasiński A. The formation of multivesicular bodies from the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):205–211. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longo F. J., Anderson E. An ultrastructural analysis of fertilization in the surf clam, Spisula solidissima. II. Development of the male pronucleus and the association of the maternally and paternally derived chromosomes. J Ultrastruct Res. 1970 Dec;33(5):515–527. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(70)90178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longo F. J., Anderson E. The fine structure of pronuclear development and fusion in the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata. J Cell Biol. 1968 Nov;39(2):339–368. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rustad R. C., Yuyama S., Rustad L. C. Nuclear-cytoplasmic relations in the mitosis of sea urchin eggs. II. The devision times of whole eggs and haploid and diploid half-eggs. Biol Bull. 1970 Apr;138(2):184–193. doi: 10.2307/1540200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urban P. The fine structure of pronuclear fusion in the coenocytic marine alga Bryopsis hypnoides Lamouroux. J Cell Biol. 1969 Aug;42(2):606–611. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.2.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wigglesworth V. B. Polyploidy and nuclear fusion in the fat body of Rhodnius (Hemiptera). J Cell Sci. 1967 Dec;2(4):603–616. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.4.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman A. M., Zimmerman S. Action of colcemid in sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):483–488. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]