Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Jun 1;62(10):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.027

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Potentiation of startle during ITI in the predictable and unpredictable conditions. The bar graphs show the difference scores in ITI startle magnitudes during the predictable and unpredictable conditions minus startle magnitude during the no-airblast condition. * for significant effect (p<.05). Note that there was a trend (p<.06) for greater startle potentiation in the unpredictable condition between the non-abstinent smokers compared to the non-smokers.