Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1983 Jun 1;96(6):1781–1785. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.6.1781

Distribution and turnover rate of acetylcholine receptors throughout the junction folds at a vertebrate neuromuscular junction

PMCID: PMC2112453  PMID: 6853602

Abstract

The distribution and turnover rate of acetylcholine receptors labeled with 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin were examined in innervated mouse sternomastoid muscle by electron microscope autoradiography using the "mask" analysis procedure. We compared the total population of receptors with receptors newly inserted at the junction 2 d after inactivation with nonradioactive alpha-bungarotoxin, both at the top (thickened) region of the postjunctional folds (pjm) and the nonthickened bottom folds. We found that the receptor site density was approximately 10 times greater on the thickened pjm than on the nonthickened bottom folds for both total and newly inserted receptors. This ratio does not change significantly during a 6-d period after labeling the new receptors. Furthermore, calculated values for turnover time of receptors show that both total and newly inserted receptors at both regions of the junctional folds have half-lives for degradation within the range given in the literature for slow junctional receptors. These data exclude a simple migration model whereby receptors are preferentially inserted in the nonthickened region of the junctional folds and then migrate into the thickened membrane at a rate equal to the turnover rate of the receptors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appel S. H., Anwyl R., McAdams M. W., Elias S. Accelerated degradation of acetylcholine receptor from cultured rat myotubes with myasthenia gravis sera and globulins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):2130–2134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bader D. Density and distribution of alpha-bungarotoxin-binding sites in postsynaptic structures of regenerated rat skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg D. K., Hall Z. W. Loss of alpha-bungarotoxin from junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors in rat diaphragm muscle in vivo and in organ culture. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):771–789. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Birks R. I. The fine structure of motor nerve endings at frog myoneural junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jan 26;135(1):8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb45458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brett R. S., Younkin S. G., Konieczkowski M., Slugg R. M. Accelerated degradation of junctional acetylcholine receptor-alpha-bungarotoxin complexes in denervated rat diaphragm. Brain Res. 1982 Feb 4;233(1):133–142. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burden S. Acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction: developmental change in receptor turnover. Dev Biol. 1977 Nov;61(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burden S. Development of the neuromuscular junction in the chick embryo: the number, distribution, and stability of acetylcholine receptors. Dev Biol. 1977 Jun;57(2):317–329. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dennis M. J. Development of the neuromuscular junction: inductive interactions between cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1981;4:43–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.04.030181.000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devreotes P. N., Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine receptor turnover in membranes of developing muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1975 May;65(2):335–358. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drachman D. B., Angus C. W., Adams R. N., Kao I. Effect of myasthenic patients' immunoglobulin on acetylcholine receptor turnover: selectivity of degradation process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jul;75(7):3422–3426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellisman M. H., Rash J. E., Staehelin L. A., Porter K. R. Studies of excitable membranes. II. A comparison of specializations at neuromuscular junctions and nonjunctional sarcolemmas of mammalian fast and slow twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1976 Mar;68(3):752–774. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fambrough D. M. Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979 Jan;59(1):165–227. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Localization of acetylcholine receptor by 125I-labeled alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse motor endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1376–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fertuck H. C., Woodward W., Salpeter M. M. In vivo recovery of muscle contraction after alpha-bungarotoxin binding. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jul;66(1):209–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.1.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heinemann S., Merlie J., Lindstrom J. Modulation of acetylcholine receptor in rat diaphragm by anti-receptor sera. Nature. 1978 Jul 6;274(5666):65–68. doi: 10.1038/274065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levitt T. A., Salpeter M. M. Denervated endplates have a dual population of junctional acetylcholine receptors. Nature. 1981 May 21;291(5812):239–241. doi: 10.1038/291239a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Loring R. H., Jones S. W., Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin. Effects of radiodecomposition on specific activity. J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb 10;257(3):1418–1423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Loring R. H., Salpeter M. M. Denervation increases turnover rate of junctional acetylcholine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2293–2297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Merlie J. P., Changeux J. P., Gros F. Acetylcholine receptor degradation measured by pulse chase labelling. Nature. 1976 Nov 4;264(5581):74–76. doi: 10.1038/264074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Michler A., Sakmann B. Receptor stability and channel conversion in the subsynaptic membrane of the developing mammalian neuromuscular junction. Dev Biol. 1980 Nov;80(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peper K., Dreyer F., Sandri C., Akert K., Moor H. Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. A freeze-etching study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974 Jun 24;149(4):437–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00223024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Porter C. W., Barnard E. A. The density of cholinergic receptors at the endplate postsynaptic membrane: ultrastructural studies in two mammalian species. J Membr Biol. 1975;20(1-2):31–49. doi: 10.1007/BF01870626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rash J. E., Ellisman M. H. Studies of excitable membranes. I. Macromolecular specializations of the neuromuscular junction and the nonjunctional sarcolemma. J Cell Biol. 1974 Nov;63(2 Pt 1):567–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.2.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Reiness C. G., Weinberg C. B., Hall Z. W. Antibody to acetylcholine receptor increases degradation of junctional and extrajunctional receptors in adult muscle. Nature. 1978 Jul 6;274(5666):68–70. doi: 10.1038/274068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SALPETER M. M., BACHMANN L. AUTORADIOGRAPHY WITH THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE. A PROCEDURE FOR IMPROVING RESOLUTION, SENSITIVITY, AND CONTRAST. J Cell Biol. 1964 Aug;22:469–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.2.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Salpeter M. M., Farquhar M. G. High resolution analysis of the secretory pathway in mammotrophs of the rat anterior pituitary. J Cell Biol. 1981 Oct;91(1):240–246. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.1.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Salpeter M. M., McHenry F. A., Salpeter E. E. Resolution of electron microscope autoradiography. IV. Application to analysis of autoradiographs. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jan;76(1):127–145. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salpeter M. M., Spanton S., Holley K., Podleski T. R. Brain extract causes acetylcholine receptor redistribution which mimics some early events at developing neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):417–425. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shainberg A., Burstein M. Decrease of acetylcholine receptor synthesis in muscle cultures by electrical stimulation. Nature. 1976 Nov 25;264(5584):368–369. doi: 10.1038/264368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stanley E. F., Drachman D. B. Effect of myasthenic immunoglobulin on acetylcholine receptors of intact mammalian neuromuscular junctions. Science. 1978 Jun 16;200(4347):1285–1287. doi: 10.1126/science.663610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Steinbach J. H., Merlie J., Heinemann S., Bloch R. Degradation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by developing rat skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3547–3551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weinberg C. B., Reiness C. G., Hall Z. W. Topographical segregation of old and new acetylcholine receptors at developing ectopic endplates in adult rat muscle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jan;88(1):215–218. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.1.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES