Skip to main content
. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8670–8675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8670

Table 1.

Pairwise comparisons of substitution rates

Species compared Replacement substitution rate Amino acid substitution rate KA/KS ratio
Ga vs. Cm Ga > Cm*§ Ga > Cm** 5.0**
Ga vs. Tb Ga > Tb*§ Ga > Tb** 2.3*
Ga vs. Th Ga > Th*§ Ga > Th** 2.3*
Pb vs. Tb Pb > Tb*§ Pb > Tb* 1.3
Pb vs. Th Pb > Th*§ Pb > Th* 1.0

Only statistically significant results are shown (∗, P < 0.05; ∗∗, P < 0.01). 

Ga, G. acuticeps; Cm, C. mawsoni; Tb, T. bernacchii; Th, T. hansoni; Pb, P. borchgrevinki. 

Relative rate test according to Wu and Li (20). 

ML test using codrates according to Muse and Gaut (21). 

§

Rate test using reconstructed ancestral sequences. 

Relative rate test with amino acid distance (Poisson correction). 

Relative rate test with amino acid gamma distance (parameter a = 0.3). KA/KS ratios relative to pairwise comparisons are also reported.