Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1985 Sep 1;101(3):755–765. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.755

Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. I. Microtubule nucleation and tubulin binding

PMCID: PMC2113742  PMID: 4030893

Abstract

We have isolated chromosomes from Chinese hamster ovary cells arrested in mitosis with vinblastine and examined the interactions of their kinetochores with purified tubulin in vitro. The kinetochores nucleate microtubule (MT) growth with complex kinetics. After an initial lag phase, MTs are continuously nucleated with both plus and minus ends distally localized. This mixed polarity seems inconsistent with the formation of an ordered, homopolar kinetochore fiber in vivo. As isolated from vinblastine-arrested cells, kinetochores contain no bound tubulin. The kinetochores of chromosomes isolated from colcemid- arrested cells or of chromosomes incubated with tubulin in vitro are brightly stained after anti-tubulin immunofluorescence. This bound tubulin is probably not in the form of MTs. It is localized to the corona region by immunoelectron microscopy, where it may play a role in MT nucleation in vitro.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergen L. G., Kuriyama R., Borisy G. G. Polarity of microtubules nucleated by centrosomes and chromosomes of Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):151–159. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhattacharyya B., Wolff J. Tubulin aggregation and disaggregation: mediation by two distinct vinblastine-binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jul;73(7):2375–2378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumenthal A. B., Dieden J. D., Kapp L. N., Sedat J. W. Rapid isolation of metaphase chromosomes containing high molecular weight DNA. J Cell Biol. 1979 Apr;81(1):255–259. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.1.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner S. L., Brinkley B. R. Tubulin assembly sites and the organization of microtubule arrays in mammalian cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 1):241–254. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Brabander M., Geuens G., De Mey J., Joniau M. Nucleated assembly of mitotic microtubules in living PTK2 cells after release from nocodazole treatment. Cell Motil. 1981;1(4):469–483. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans L., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Influence of the centrosome on the structure of nucleated microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1185–1191. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haimo L. T., Telzer B. R., Rosenbaum J. L. Dynein binds to and crossbridges cytoplasmic microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5759–5763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heidemann S. R., McIntosh J. R. Visualization of the structural polarity of microtubules. Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):517–519. doi: 10.1038/286517a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henderson R., Jubb J. S., Whytock S. Specific labelling of the protein and lipid on the extracellular surface of purple membrane. J Mol Biol. 1978 Aug 5;123(2):259–274. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90325-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jokelainen P. T. The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jul;19(1):19–44. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuriyama R. Activity and stability of centrosomes in Chinese hamster ovary cells in nucleation of microtubules in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1984 Mar;66:277–295. doi: 10.1242/jcs.66.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis C. D., Laemmli U. K. Higher order metaphase chromosome structure: evidence for metalloprotein interactions. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):171–181. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGill M., Brinkley B. R. Human chromosomes and centrioles as nucleating sites for the in vitro assembly of microtubules from bovine brain tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1975 Oct;67(1):189–199. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McNeill P. A., Berns M. W. Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Mar;88(3):543–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.3.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):766–777. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nicklas R. B., Staehly C. A. Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00330544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pepper D. A., Brinkley B. R. Localization of tubulin in the mitotic apparatus of mammalian cells by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. Chromosoma. 1977 Apr 19;60(3):223–235. doi: 10.1007/BF00329772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pepper D. A., Brinkley B. R. Microtubule initiation at kinetochores and centrosomes in lysed mitotic cells. Inhibition of site-specific nucleation by tubulin antibody. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):585–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peterson J. B., Ris H. Electron-microscopic study of the spindle and chromosome movement in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):219–242. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pickett-Heaps J. D., Tippit D. H., Porter K. R. Rethinking mitosis. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):729–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rieder C. L., Borisy G. G. The attachment of kinetochores to the pro-metaphase spindle in PtK1 cells. Recovery from low temperature treatment. Chromosoma. 1981;82(5):693–716. doi: 10.1007/BF00285776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rieder C. L. The structure of the cold-stable kinetochore fiber in metaphase PtK1 cells. Chromosoma. 1981;84(1):145–158. doi: 10.1007/BF00293368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ris H., Witt P. L. Structure of the mammalian kinetochore. Chromosoma. 1981;82(2):153–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00286101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roos U. P. Mitosis in the cellular slime mold Polysphondylium violaceum. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):480–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schibler M. J., Pickett-Heaps J. D. Mitosis in Oedogonium: spindle microfilaments and the origin of the kinetochore fiber. Eur J Cell Biol. 1980 Oct;22(2):687–698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sluder G., Rieder C. L. Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):897–903. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Snyder J. A., McIntosh J. R. Initiation and growth of microtubules from mitotic centers in lysed mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):744–760. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Summers K., Kirschner M. W. Characteristics of the polar assembly and disassembly of microtubules observed in vitro by darkfield light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):205–217. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Telzer B. R., Moses M. J., Rosenbaum J. L. Assembly of microtubules onto kinetochores of isolated mitotic chromosomes of HeLa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Oct;72(10):4023–4027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Witt P. L., Ris H., Borisy G. G. Origin of kinetochore microtubules in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Chromosoma. 1980;81(3):483–505. doi: 10.1007/BF00368158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Witt P. L., Ris H., Borisy G. G. Structure of kinetochore fibers: microtubule continuity and inter-microtubule bridges. Chromosoma. 1981;83(4):523–540. doi: 10.1007/BF00328277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES