Abstract
Inactivating and noninactivating Na+ conductances are known to generate, respectively, the rising phase and the prolonged plateau phase of cerebellar Purkinje cell (PC) action potentials. These conductances have different voltage activation levels, suggesting the possibility that two distinct types of ion channels are involved. Single Purkinje cell reverse transcription–PCR from guinea pig cerebellar slices identified two Na+ channel α subunit transcripts, the orthologs of RBI (rat brain I) and Nach6/Scn8a. The latter we shall name CerIII. In situ hybridization histochemistry in rat brain demonstrated broad CerIII expression at high levels in many neuronal groups in the brain and spinal cord, with little if any expression in white matter, or nerve tracts. RBII (rat brain II), the most commonly studied recombinant Na+ channel α subunit is not expressed in PCs. As the absence of Scn8a has been correlated with motor endplate disease (med), in which transient sodium currents are spared, RBI appears to be responsible for the transient sodium current in PC. Conversely, jolting mice with a mutated Scn8a message demonstrates PC abnormalities in rapid, simple spike generation, linking CerIII to the persistent sodium current.
Keywords: cerebellum, persistent Na+ channel
The electrical activity of excitable tissues is mediated by voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels. Purkinje cells express at least two different voltage-gated sodium conductances, one responsible for the fast depolarization phase of the action potential and the second for the prolonged plateau potentials (1). This latter current activates at more negative potentials (2). Noninactivating Na+ conductances are also seen in other neurons (3–6) and play an important role in neuronal oscillatory properties (7, 8).
Eleven different genes that encode subunits of voltage-gated Na+ channels have been identified in mammals (9–23). Of these, eight are expressed in the nervous system (11, 22–25); two of these are also expressed in heart and denervated skeletal muscle (11, 14).
Biochemical studies have shown that voltage-gated sodium channels are composed of a large (230 to 270 kDa) subunit and several smaller subunits (26–28). The biophysical characteristics of the INa supported by the large subunit is significantly modulated by its associated subunits (28, 29) and its phosphorylation status (30–32).
To determine whether the transient and maintained Na+ conductances in PCs could be supported by different sodium channels, the Na+ channel α subunit transcripts expressed in these cells were studied using single-cell reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR). Part of these results have been presented in abstract form (33).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Single-Cell RT-PCR.
Single-cell RT-PCR was performed as described by Lambolez et al. (34). All materials were freed of RNase by heating at 160°C or soaking in 3% H2O2 for 10 min. Solutions were made in double-distilled water from GIBCO/BRL.
The electrodes were filled with recording solution containing 120 mM CsCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM EGTA and 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.2. The reverse transcriptase master-mix solution included 1.67 mM dNTP, 4.17 mM MgCl2, 4,000 units per ml of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus RNase H− reverse transcriptase, 6.25 μM random hexamer primer, 1,667 units per ml of RNase inhibitor. The PCR master-mix solution included 26.7 mM KCl, 0.66 mM MgCl2, 1.7 μM of the sense and antisense primers, and 5.33 mM Tris⋅HCl, pH 8.3. Taq polymerase enzyme mix included 24 mM KCl, 0.60 mM MgCl2, 500 units per ml Taq polymerase, and 4.8 mM Tris⋅HCl, pH 8.3.
Primer Design.
Oligonucleotides matching the S6 region of the third and fourth repeats flanking a stretch of 924 nucleotides of known sodium channel α subunits (12, 13, 15–19, 21, 35–39) were designed (40). The sense oligonucleotide ATT GGT/C GTT/C ATT/C ATT/C/A GAT/C AAN TT is a 23-mer with a degeneracy of 144, and the antisense oligonucleotide TC CAG GAT GAC/T NG/AC A/G/TAT G/ATA CAT G/ATT, a 27-mer with a degeneracy of 192.
RNA Collection, Reverse Transcription, and PCR.
RNA from single guinea pig Purkinje cells was obtained using recording microelectrodes filled with 8 μl of recording solution. The electrodes were emptied into 0.5-ml Ependorf tubes and subjected to reverse transcription as follows: 12 μl of reverse transcriptase master mix was added to the tube and 50 μl of oil was laid over, the tubes were incubated for 10 min at 20°C, followed by 15 min at 42°C and 5 min at 99°C, and then cooled to 5°C for 5 min. PCR solution mix (75 μl) was added to the cDNA, the mixture was heated for 5 min at 94°C, 5 μl Taq solution was added, and 45 cycles of PCR were applied [1 min annealing at 48°C (except the first two annealing cycles that were at 45°C), 1 min extension at 72°C, and 1 min denaturing at 94°C]. RT-PCR from cerebellar tissue was performed in a similar way to the single-cell RT-PCR except that 50 ng of total cerebellar RNA was used instead of the Purkinje cell RNA. The bands obtained from the RT-PCR were gel purified using Schleicher & Schuell NA45 DEAE-paper, ligated into T-tailed SmaI cut pBluescript (41), and sequenced by the dideoxisequencing method (42) using Sequenase (United States Biochemical).
Probes for Northern Blot Analysis and in Situ Hybridization.
Probes were prepared by labeling cDNA fragments using the random hexamer primer method (43) with 32P or 35S (for Northern blots and in situ hybridization, respectively). The following fragments were used: RBI, 638 bp from nucleotides 5952–6598 (17); RBII, 650 bp from nucleotides 5874–6524 (18); and CerIII (the first 523 nucleotides of the clone isolated from the cerebellar RT-PCR).
Preparation of RNA and Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA from adult (150–175 g) Sprague-Dawley rat cerebellum was prepared using the guanidinium-thyocianate method (44), and poly(A) was selected with oligo(dT) cellulose columns as previously described (45). The RNA was electrophoresed in formaldehyde-denaturing gels and transferred to Hybond N (Amersham) (45). The blots were hybridized with 1 × 106 cpm TCA precipitable counts (0.5 to 1.0 ng of DNA/ml) of 32P-labeled probes per ml at 68°C in Stratagene Quick Hib for 2 h. After hybridization the blots were washed twice at room temperature in 2× SSC with 0.1% SDS for 15 min, and then washed for 30 min at 60°C in 0.1× SSC with 0.1% SDS. The blot was exposed overnight at −70°C without intensifying screens.
In Situ Hybridization.
Rat brain sections were hybridized with 35S-labeled probes as previously described by Stone et al. (46). Briefly, the rats were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal; 90 mg/kg, i.p.) and perfused transcardially with normal saline containing 0.5% NaNO2 and 10 units per ml of heparin followed by 400 ml of ice-cooled 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 4% formaldehyde (prepared from paraformaldehyde). The brains were removed, cut in blocks, postfixed for 2–4 h in the 4% formaldehyde solution, and placed in 30% sucrose overnight or until blocks settled. Coronal or sagittal (30–40 μm) freezing microtome sections were collected in scintillation vials containing cold 2× SSC made in diethyl-pyrocarbonate water. The sections were prehybridized for 1–2 h at 48°C in a 53% formamide solution (1.75× SSC/8.8% dextran sulfate/3.5× Denhardt’s solution/50 mM dithiothreitol/4.4 mM EDTA/44 mM Tris, pH7.4/1.4 mg/ml sonicated denatured salmon sperm DNA). After prehybridization, denatured labeled probe was added and the sections hybridized for 17 h at 48°C. After hybridization, the sections were washed twice with 2× SSC solution at 48°C followed by washing with SSC solutions of decreasing concentration: 1×, 0.5×, 0.25×, and 0.1× for 15 min at each concentration. The sections were transferred into 0.1 M phosphate buffer, mounted on slides, and air dried. The slides were exposed to Microvision-C (Dupont) film for 2–7 days and then dipped in photographic emulsion (Kodak NTB-2) and stored at 4°C (in the dark) for 6–21 days. After developing in Kodak D-19, the slides were fixed, counterstained with cresyl violet, and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher Scientific). The data were analyzed by dark-field and bright-field microscopy with an Olympus BH2 photomicroscope. Central nervous system neuronal populations were identified using standard anatomical references (47–49).
RESULTS
The PCR Target Sequence Is Not Contiguous in the Genome.
The primers designed to identify sodium channel α subunit transcripts did not amplify the expected products when genomic DNA was used (Fig. 1a, lanes D and F), but were able to amplify cerebellar rtRNA (Fig. 1a, lane B). The lack of amplification from genomic DNA was not due to the quality of the DNA because a fragment of 764 bp of exon III of Kv3 potassium channels was amplified (50). This suggests that the sequence spanned by the primers is not contiguous in the genome. In sodium channel α subunit genes with known genomic organization, the sequence that is amplified from mRNA transcripts is derived from four different exons (39, 51–53).
Three Different Sodium Channel α Subunits Are Expressed in Cerebellum.
Twenty-seven individual isolates from two independent amplifications from cerebellar rtRNA were sequenced. Three different sodium channel α subunits sequences were found: Rat Brain I (RBI), Rat Brain II (RBII), and CerIII. Northern blot analysis of poly(A) cerebellar RNA shows the typical bands for RBI (Fig. 1b, lane A) and RBII (Fig. 1b, lane B), and a weak ≈10-kb band and a strong band of ≈12 kb for CerIII (Fig. 1b, lane C).
Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Expressed Two Different Sodium Channels.
PCR-generated bands from rtRNA derived from single PC (Fig. 1c, lane E) were subcloned, and individual clones were sequenced. Two different sequences were found; one was identified as the guinea pig ortholog of rat brain I (98% identity) and the other one the guinea pig ortholog of CerIII (100% identity) (Fig. 2). In situ hybridization experiments in rat brains showed that RBI and CerIII are expressed in Purkinje cells (Fig. 3 D and F, respectively). RBI was also expressed in deep cerebellar nuclei and weakly in the granular cell layer (Fig. 3 A and D). RBII, the most commonly studied isoform in heterologous expression systems, was expressed strongly in the granular cell layer but has no detectable expression on cerebellar Purkinje cells (Fig. 3 B and E). CerIII was strongly expressed in granule and Purkinje cells and was strongly expressed in the molecular cell layer. The signal in cerebellar white matter was similar to background. Deep cerebellar nuclear cells were also strongly labeled (Fig. 3 C and F).
CerIII Is Broadly Expressed in the Central Nervous System.
In situ hybridization experiments showed that CerIII mRNA was abundant in many neuronal populations of the central nervous system. In the olfactory bulb, signal was found over the glomerular and mitral cell layers, and moderate expression was seen in granular cells. Higher levels of expression were found in anterior, dorsal, lateral (Fig. 4A), and ventral olfactory nuclei (Fig. 4B). In cerebral cortex strong expression was observed displaying a lamellar distribution (Fig. 4 A–G). The mRNA was more abundantly expressed in the retrosplenial (Fig. 4 D–F) and piriform (Fig. 4 A–D) cortex. In these cortical areas the message was highly expressed in layer II (Fig. 5 A and C). In the parietal cortex strong labeling was seen in the large neurons of layer V (Fig. 5B). In the hippocampus high levels of expression were observed in CA1-CA3 pyramidal cells (Fig. 4 A and D–F and Fig. 5D), in the granule cells, and in some interneurons of the polymorphic layer of the dentate gyrus (Fig. 4 A and D–G and Fig. 5D). High levels of expression were also found in the septo-hippocampal nucleus, while moderate levels of expression were observed in the caudate-putamen (Fig. 4 A and C), hypothalamic nuclei, and the reticular thalamus. Stronger signals were found in the medial habenular nucleus and in several thalamic nuclei (VPM, VPL, VL, and VM; Fig. 4D). The CerIII mRNA was also found in the entopeduncular nucleus and in the amygdala. In the latter structure the level of expression was higher in the BLA and BLP nuclei (Fig. 4D). Several midbrain structures also expressed high levels of CerIII mRNA, such as the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body, anterior pretectal nucleus, the nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (Fig. 4E), deep mesencephalic nucleus (Fig. 4F), interpeduncular nucleus, and oculomotor nucleus (Fig. 4G). Fewer high levels of expression were observed in the superior colliculus and in substantia nigra reticulata (Fig. 4F). Medium levels of expression were found in the caudal interpeduncular nucleus and the intermediate interpeduncular nucleus (Fig. 4G). The mRNA was highly expressed in the medulla pons region with strong expression in the internal part of the lateral parabrachial nucleus, and in the trapezoid nucleus, dorsal tegmental nucleus (Fig. 4H), pontine nuclei (Fig. 4G), oral part of the pontine reticular nucleus (Fig. 4H), and vestibular nuclei. High levels of expression were also found in all the deep cerebellar nuclei (Figs. 4I and 5E). In these nuclei the mRNA was highly expressed by the large neurons (Fig. 5 G and H). High levels of expression were also found in cuneate, gracilis, hypoglossal, facial, and spinal trigeminal nuclei (Fig. 4J), and in the inferior olive (Figs. 4J and 5F). In the spinal cord the mRNA was abundantly expressed in gray matter. Background signals were found over the corpus callosus (Figs. 4 A, C, and D, and 5A), cerebellar white matter (Fig. 3 C and F), anterior comisure (Fig. 4 A–D), and nerve tracts such as the facial (not shown) and hypoglossal nerve bundles (Fig. 5F).
DISCUSSION
mRNA transcripts for three sodium channel α subunits were found by RT-PCR of cerebellum, RbI, RbII, and CerIII. Of this, only RbI and CerIII were expressed in adult Purkinje cells based on single-cell RT-PCR (Figs. 1, 3, and 4) and in situ hybridization histochemistry (Fig. 3). We also show that CerIII is mostly a neuronal channel, highly expressed in the brain and spinal cord.
Electrophysiologically, Purkinje cells demonstrate two different sodium conductances, a fast-inactivating and a noninactivating or persistent conductance (1). These have similar single-channel conductance but differ in their voltage-dependence, with the persistent sodium channel activating at potentials negative to those required for the activation of the transient sodium currents (2). Several hypotheses have been proposed to account for the persistent sodium currents: (i) It represents a window current from the traditional Na conductance (54). However, the theoretical curve does not correspond to the experimental findings (54). (ii) It results from a sodium channel with multiple gating states, where the switching between gating states is voltage-dependent (55). (iii) It is supported by a Na+ channel different from that responsible for the transient conductance.
The results presented here, together with recent observations from mutant mice, support the latter hypothesis. Thus, it was found that an insertion in the gene encoding Scn8a produces a med phenotype (56). This finding has been confirmed by demonstrating that medj and med result in premature termination of the coding sequence of Scn8a, producing nonfunctional Scn8a channels (57). Electrophysiological studies of med mice show that their Purkinje cells generate abnormally low simple-spike frequency without altering axonal conduction velocity (58). These findings indicate that med Purkinje cells express functional transient sodium channels and, therefore, that RBI encodes such channels.
In contrast to the “jolting” mutant, an allele of med has a defect in Scn8a that causes a positive shift in the voltage dependence of these channels (59). Interestingly, in this mutant, PC fail to generate simple spike trains (58, 60), as would be expected if the persistent sodium conductance functions as a graded spike-boosting system (1). Taken together, the data presented here suggest that RBI mediates the fast, transient conductance and CerIII, the persistent Na current in cerebellar Purkinje cells. However, as neither the RBI nor CerIII subunits have been expressed in heterologous expression systems, the above conclusion must remain tentative. (Such studies will determine whether the special properties of the maintained Na conductance depend on the structure of the large subunit itself or on interactions with β subunits or specific postranslational modifications.)
Acknowledgments
We thank Joseph Frey for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke to R.L. (NS13742) and to B.R. (NS30989).
ABBREVIATIONS
- PC
Purkinje cell
- RT-PCR
reverse transcription–PCR
- RBI and II
rat brain I and II, respectively
Footnotes
References
- 1.Llinás R, Sugimori M. J Physiol. 1980;305:174–195. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sugimori M, Kay A R, Llinás R. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1994;20:63. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Connors B W, Gutnick M J, Prince P A. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:1302–1321. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.6.1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.French C R, Gage P W. Neurosci Lett. 1985;56:289–293. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(85)90257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schwindt P C, Crill W E. J Neurophysiol. 1980;43:1700–1724. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.6.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stafstrom C E, Schwindt P C, Crill W E. Brain Res. 1982;236:221–226. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alonso A, Llinás R. Nature (London) 1989;342:175–177. doi: 10.1038/342175a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Llinás R, Grace A A, Yarom Y. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:897–901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akopian A N, Sivilotti L, Wood J N. Nature (London) 1996;379:257–262. doi: 10.1038/379257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Felipe A, Knittle J, Doyle K L, Tamkun M M. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:30125–30131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gautron S, DosSantos G, Pinto-Henrique D, Koulakoff A, Gros F, Bewald-Netter Y. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7272–7276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gellens M E, George A L, Jr, Chen L Q, Chahine M, Horn R, Barchi R L, Kallen R G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:554–558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.George A L, Jr, Knittle T J, Tamkun M M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:4893–4897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kallen R G, Sheng Z H, Yang J, Chen L Q, Rogart R B, Barchi R L. Neuron. 1990;4:233–242. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90098-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kayano T, Noda M, Flockerzi V, Takahashi H, Numa S. FEBS Lett. 1988;228:187–194. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80614-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klugbauer N, Lacinova L, Flockerzi V, Hofmann F. EMBO J. 1995;14:1084–1090. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07091.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Noda M, Ikeda T, Kayano T, Suzuki H, Takeshima H, Kurasaki M, Takahashi H, Numa S. Nature (London) 1986;320:188–192. doi: 10.1038/320188a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noda M, Numa S. J Recept Res. 1987;7:467–497. doi: 10.3109/10799898709054998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rogart R B, Cribbs L L, Muglia L K, Kephart D, Kaiser M W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:8170–8174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.8170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sangameswaran L B, Delgado S G, Fish L M, Koch B D, Jakeman L B, Stewart G R, Sze P, Hunter J C, Eglen R M, Herman R C. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5953–5956. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.11.5953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trimmer J S, Cooperman S S, Tomiko S A, Zhou J Y, Crean S M, Boyle M B, Kallen R G, Sheng Z H, Barchi R L, Sigworth F J, Goodman R H, Agnew W S, Mandel G. Neuron. 1989;3:33–49. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90113-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schaller K L, Krzemien D M, Yarowsky P J, Krueger B K, Caldwell J H. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3231–3242. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03231.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Toledo-Aral J J, Moss B L, He Z J, Koszowski A G, Whisenand T, Levinson S R, Wolf J J, Silos-Santiago I, Halegoua S, Mandel G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1527–1532. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yarowsky P J, Krueger B K, Olson C E, Clevinger E C, Koos R D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:9453–9457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yarowsky P J, Krueger B K, Olson C E, Clevinger E C, Koos R D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Catterall W A. Science. 1988;242:50–61. doi: 10.1126/science.2459775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goldin A L. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1993;3:272–277. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(93)90117-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Isom L L, De Jongh K S, Catterall W A. Neuron. 1994;12:1183–1194. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90436-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Isom L L, De Jongh K S, Patton D E, Reber B F, Offord J, Charbonneau H, Walsh K, Goldin A L, Catterall W A. Science. 1992;256:839–842. doi: 10.1126/science.1375395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Numann R, Catterall W A, Scheuer T. Science. 1991;254:115–118. doi: 10.1126/science.1656525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.West J W, Patton D E, Scheuer T, Wang Y, Goldin A L, Catterall W A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10910–10914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li M, West J W, Lai Y, Scheuer T, Catterall W A. Neuron. 1992;8:1151–1159. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90135-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rudy B, Vega-Saenz de Miera E, Sugimori M, Llinás R. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1994;20:64. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lambolez B, Audinat E, Bochet P, Crepel F, Rossier J. Neuron. 1992;9:247–258. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Anderson P A V, Holman M A, Greenberg R M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7419–7423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sato C, Matsumoto G. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;186:61–68. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)80775-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rosenthal J J, Gilly W F. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10026–10030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ramaswami M, Tanouye M A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2079–2082. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Salkoff L, Butler A, Scavrda N, Wie A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:8569–8572. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.20.8569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vega-Saenz de Miera E C, Jen-Wei L. Methods Enzymol. 1992;207:613–619. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)07044-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mead D A, Pey N K, Herrnstadt C, Marcil R A, Smith L M. Bio/Technology. 1991;9:657–663. doi: 10.1038/nbt0791-657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson A R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Feinberg A, Vogelstein B. Analyt Biochem. 1983;132:6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chomczyznski P, Sacchi N. Analyt Biochem. 1987;162:156–159. doi: 10.1006/abio.1987.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rudy B, Hoger J H, Lester H A, Davidson N. Neuron. 1988;1:649–658. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90164-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Stone D M, Wessel T, Joh T H, Baker H. Mol Brain Res. 1990;8:291–300. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(90)90042-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paxinos G. The Brain Nervous System. 2nd Ed. New York: Academic; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 2nd Ed. Orlando, FL: Academic; 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Swanson L W. Brain Maps: Structure of the Rat Brain. New York: Elsevier; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vega Saenz de Miera E, Weiser M, Kentros C, Lau D, Moreno H, Serodio P, Rudy B. Handbook of Membrane Channels. New York: Academic; 1994. pp. 41–78. [Google Scholar]
- 51.George A L, Jr, Iyer G S, Kleinfield R, Kallen R G, Barchi R L. Genomics. 1993;15:598–606. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Loughney K, Kreber R, Ganetzky B. Cell. 1989;58:1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90512-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.McClatchey A I, Lin C S, Wang J, Hoffman E P, Rojas C, Gusella J F. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;1:521–527. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.7.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.French C R, Sah P, Buckett K J, Gage P W. J Gen Physiol. 1990;95:1139–1157. doi: 10.1085/jgp.95.6.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Moorman J R, Kirsch G E, VanDongen A M J, Joho R H, Brown A M. Neuron. 1990;4:243–252. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Burgess D L, Kohrman D C, Galt J, Plummer N W, Jones J M, Spear B, Meisler M H. Nat Genet. 1995;10:461–465. doi: 10.1038/ng0895-461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kohrman D C, Harris J B, Meisler M H. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17576–17581. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Harris J B, Boakes R J, Court J A. J Neurol Sci. 1992;110:186–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(92)90027-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kohrman D C, Smith M R, Goldin A L, Harris J, Meisler M H. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5993–5999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-05993.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dick D J, Boakes R J, Candy J M, Harris J B, Cullen M J. J Neurol Sci. 1986;76:255–267. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(86)90173-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]