Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 19;2(12):e1336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001336

Figure 4. Mean movement variability in the x-direction as a function of the percentage of total movement distance in the y-direction shown for the final 20 trials of learning averaged across all subjects.

Figure 4

(A) For movements in the NF. The mean value (dotted line) plus mean standard error (shaded areas) are shown for both vision and no-vision conditions. While the variability is higher in the no-vision condition throughout the movement this becomes most prominent towards the end of the movement. Times with a significant difference between the visual and non-visual conditions are indicated by the black (p<0.05) and red (p<0.001) lines at the top of the figure (Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons). (B) Movements in the CF. The largest difference in the variability between the no-vision and vision conditions occurs at the end of the movement. (C) Movements in the DF. No significant differences were found. (D) Uncorrected p-values for the paired t-tests performed for each of the three force fields. The uncorrected p = 0.05 level is indicated with the thin dotted line.