Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2006 Dec 26;48(3):351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.10.007

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean (± SEM) ratings of (a) portion size and (b) energy content of less-aerated and more-aerated snacks in 28 subjects. Mean ratings of portion size were significantly higher for the less-aerated snack (* p = 0.003), but mean ratings of energy content did not differ significantly by snack type. Ratings were assessed before consumption of the snack. Since there were no interactions of snack type with snack serving method or subject sex, mean ratings across these factors are shown.