Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Apr;16(4):803–808. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0973

Table 3.

Mean PhIP-DNA adduct level in prostate nontumor and tumor cells of prostate cancer cases across meat preparation categories

Meat category Doneness level
P value
Rare
Medium
Well done
Very well done
n Absorbance (mean ± SD) n Absorbance (mean ± SD) n Absorbance (mean ± SD) n Absorbance (mean ± SD)
Nontumor
Grilled steak/pork chop (n = 143) 7 0.161 ± 0.035 73 0.172 ± 0.041 58 0.173 ± 0.039 5 0.157 ± 0.027 0.81
Grilled hamburger (n = 124) 3 0.149 ± 0.018 40 0.174 ± 0.039 75 0.173 ± 0.044 6 0.167 ± 0.046 0.78
Grilled hot dog (n = 84) 3 0.157 ± 0.0088 12 0.191 ± 0.048 58 0.173 ± 0.039 11 0.177 ± 0.043 0.46
Tumor
Grilled steak/pork chop (n = 143) 7 0.109 ± 0.020 73 0.109 ± 0.025 58 0.109 ± 0.026 5 0.0934 ± 0.024 0.55
Grilled hamburger (n = 124) 3 0.0916 ± 0.0095 40 0.113 ± 0.027 75 0.109 ± 0.030 6 0.105 ± 0.037 0.64
Grilled hot dog (n = 84) 3 0.104 ± 0.020 12 0.121 ± 0.027 58 0.109 ± 0.024 11 0.114 ± 0.027 0.49