Skip to main content
. 1998 Nov 30;143(5):1201–1213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1201

Table III.

Quantitation of Phenotypes in Control Strains

Parental genotype % WT % Mup % Pat % E Broods
Control phenotypes at 25°C
 + mup-2(up1)/lon-2 + 79  5  0 16 6
 + mup-2(ts)/lon-2 + 74 21  0  5 9
unc-52/unc-52; mnDp34 67  0  3 30 5
myo-3 +/+ sqt-3 66  0  7 26 4
 + unc-44 deb-1 +/unc-82 ++ unc-24 81  0  3 16 6
 + egl-19 +/unc-82 + unc-24 87  0  1 12 6
pat-10 +/+ dpy-5 88  0  2 10 7
Control phenotypes at 15°C
mup-2(ts)/mup-2(ts) 95     .08  0  3 5
unc-52/unc-52; mnDp34 71  0 1.5 27 5
myo-3 +/+ sqt-3  8  0  6 10 8
 + unc-44 deb-1 +/unc-82 ++ unc-24 85  0  4 11 5
 + egl-19 +/unc-82 + unc-24 82  0  1 17 5
pat-10 +/+ dpy-5 79  0  2 19 5

WT refers to any animal that was not Mup, Pat or unhatched (E) regardless of genotype. Mups and Pats were scored as those animals that had hatched, without manipulation, from the egg shell. The specific alleles used are designated in Tables I and II. The skewed percentage of WT (>75% expected, relative to number of embryos) and Pats scored (25% expected) is likely due to disintegration of arrested mutants several days after egg laying.