Skip to main content
. 1999 Jun 14;145(6):1177–1188. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.6.1177

Table III.

Mutants Defective in bad15 Display a Daughter-specific Defect in Bud-site Selection

% Class I % Class II % Class III
Relevant genotype graphic file with name JCB9902007.t3.jpg % Class IV Other n
1. α BAD15 98  1 <1 <1 200
2. aBAD15/BAD15  7 33 53 7 600
3. α bad15 21 71  5 4 300
4. abad15/bad15  9 20 63 8 300
5. α bad43 22 51 21 6 100
6. α bud4 10 27 40 24 300
Relevant genotype % Class I % Classes II, III, IV
7. a 1 bad15/+ 93  7 100
8. a 1 bad15/bad15 15 85 100
9. a 1 bad43/bad15 12 88 100

Budding pattern was determined by analyzing the morphology of microcolonies (see Materials and Methods). Class I, axial pattern, mother and daughter cells budded adjacent to the previous division site; Class II, mother cells budded near the previous division site, daughter cells budded distal to the previous division site; Class III, both mother and daughter cells budded distal to the previous division site; Class IV, all other microcolony morphologies. Class II and III together represent the bipolar budding pattern. The mother cell is drawn on the left. Strains used were: SY77, line 1; SY204, line 2; SY167, line 3; SY202, line 4; SY172, line 5; SY171, line 6; SY221 × IH2531, line 7; SY221 × SY167, line 8; and SY221 × SY172, line 9.