Skip to main content
. 1997 Sep 8;138(5):1125–1137. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.5.1125

Table I.

The Density of Gap Junctions in Control and FGF4-treated Mesenchyme Cultures

Anterior mesenchyme: gap junctions per 3,600 μm2 ± SEM N experiments (n) fields Posterior mesenchyme: gap junctions per 3,600 μm2 ± SEM N experiments (n) fields
Plating density Cx No FGF4 With FGF4 P No FGF4 With FGF4 P
cells/10 μl
Chick 4 × 104    169 ± 21  155 ± 18 (a) >0.5    164 ± 28    382 ± 53 <0.001
43 3 (30) 3(30) 3 (26) 3 (26)
   264 ± 24 200 ± 20 <0.02
5 (46) 5 (42)
2 × 104 43          14 ± 1.1 31 ± 3 <0.007
2 (30) 2 (30)
1 × 104 43 18.5 ± 1.4 28.9 ± 2.3 < 0.01
3 (40) 3 (40)
Mouse 4 × 104 43    378 ± 83  369 ± 82 >0.6 209 ± 22 418 ± 50 <0.001
3 (43) 3 (43) 6 (90) 6 (80)
43    248 ± 16 213 ± 10 >0.1
2 (22) 2 (22)
32    111 ± 17  121 ± 17 >0.8 76 ± 7 164 ± 19 <0.001
4 (43) 4 (43) 5 (28) 5 (28)
32 47.6 ± 4 83.6 ± 5 <0.001
4 (42) 4 (42)

Results from all experiments, grouped appropriately. Data taken from single optical sections through the monolayer region of the cultures. One experiment comparing chick control and FGF4-treated anterior mesenchyme was counted as a projection and has been omitted; there was no difference (P > 0.6) between untreated and FGF4-treated cultures. The average number of gap junctions between cells at very low density (1 × 104) cells/10 μl) is probably overestimated because gap junctions were patchy and counts were made over regions where gap junctions could clearly be identified.