Skip to main content
. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9642–9647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9642

Table 2.

Comparison of in vitro growth inhibition potency of epothilone derivatives against various parent and drug-resistant tumor cell lines

Compound DC-3F DC-3F/ADX P388/0 P388/Adr SK-N-As SK-N-FI MCF-7 MCF-7/Adr
IC50, μM*
1 0.0037 0.053 0.0018 0.0010 0.012 0.023 0.0030 0.0094
(14.5×) (5.3×) (1.9×) (3.1×)
2 0.0006 0.017 0.00029 0.0016 0.004 0.010 0.0005 0.0027
(28×) (5.5×) (25×) (5.4×)
3 0.011 0.042 0.0213 0.0125 0.073 0.223 0.032 0.144
(3.9×) (0.59×) (3.1×) (4.5×)
4 0.00097 0.00091 0.0068 0.0042 0.021 0.046 0.0029 0.0071
(0.9×) (0.62×) (2.2×) (2.4×)
Paclitaxel 0.095 32.0 0.0029 0.326 0.0016 0.130 0.0033 0.150
(338×) (111×) (80×) (46×)
Actinomycin D 0.00044 0.572 0.00015 0.0012 0.00085 0.0119 0.00068 0.00167
(13,000×) (8×) (14×) (2.5×)
Adriamycin 0.018 2.236 0.0055 2.65 0.077 1.42 0.057 0.216
(124×) (482×) (18.4×) (3.8×)

 Numbers in parentheses are folds of resistance based on the IC50 ratio when compared with the corresponding parent cell lines except for P388/0 and P388/Adr, and XTT assay (21) was used. 

*

Cell growth inhibition was measured by protein-staining SRB assay (22) after 72-h incubation as described previously. The IC50 values were determined with six to seven concentrations of each drug using a computer program. (23, 24).