Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 1;7:271. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-271

Table 2.

Risk behaviors by site

Nairobi (n = 106) Beijing (n = 366) Hanoi (n = 645) Kharkiv (n = 438) Minsk (n = 400) St. Petersburg (n = 400) Bogota (n = 237) Gran Rosario (n = 329) Rio de Janeiro (n = 189) Santos (n = 74)
Receptive Sharing 28 27 19 52 30 54 47 23 36 22
Distributive Sharing 44 22 9 47 32 65 44 16 39 15
Cooker/Cotton/RinseWater Sharing 40 16 9 28 59 81 68 30 48 43
Drawing From a Common Solution 18 20 14 82 68 80 67 27 63 32
Pre-Filled Syringe 3 1 11 61 26 6 3 20 32 18
Frontloading/Backloading/Splitting 14 9 14 23 25 69 2 13 17 8
Receptive Sharing Primary Sex Partner 6 3 3 16 7 15 6 8 3 7
Receptive Sharing Close Friend 22 23 14 39 23 36 34 18 26 15
Distributive Sharing Primary Sex Partner 5 - 1 16 8 17 5 5 8 3
Distributive Sharing Close Friend 42 - 5 37 20 40 37 13 26 8
Unprotected Sex Primary Partners 39 47 40 83 58 38 58 50 53 51
Unprotected Sex Casual Partners 7 10 5 27 20 12 27 25 50 18

Notes: Cell contents are the percentage of IDUs engaging in the risk behavior in the past 6 months. IDUs in Beijing were not asked about distributive sharing with primary sex partners and close friends. Missing data for other sites and behaviors ranged from 0–10% but was less than 1% in 75% of the 118 cells above.