Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 14;104(47):18654–18659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704652104

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

K-means clustering analysis on the basis of both genetic and epigenetic markers. K-means clustering including genetic information yielded very homogenous groups. Twenty-two cases were classified as CIMP1 (23%), 37 cases (38%) were classified as CIMP2, and 38 cases (39%) were classified as CIMP negative. This clustering largely overlaps with the previous hierarchical clustering with only 17 cases (18%) reclassified.