Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1995 Apr;4(4):636–654. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040405

Proline cis-trans isomerization in staphylococcal nuclease: multi-substrate free energy perturbation calculations.

A Hodel 1, L M Rice 1, T Simonson 1, R O Fox 1, A T Brünger 1
PMCID: PMC2143107  PMID: 7613463

Abstract

Staphylococcal nuclease A exists in two folded forms that differ in the isomerization state of the Lys 116-Pro 117 peptide bond. The dominant form (90% occupancy) adopts a cis peptide bond, which is observed in the crystal structure. NMR studies show that the relatively small difference in free energy between the cis and trans forms (delta Gcis-->trans approximately 1.2 kcal/mol) results from large and nearly compensating differences in enthalpy and entropy (delta Hcis-->trans approximately delta TScis-->trans approximately 10 kcal/mol). There is evidence from X-ray crystal structures that the structural differences between the cis and the trans forms of nuclease are confined to the conformation of residues 112-117, a solvated protein loop. Here, we obtain a thermodynamic and structural description of the conformational equilibrium of this protein loop through an exhaustive conformational search that identified several substates followed by free energy simulations between the substrates. By partitioning the search into conformational substates, we overcame the multiple minima problem in this particular case and obtained precise and reproducible free energy values. The protein and water environment was implicitly modeled by appropriately chosen nonbonded terms between the explicitly treated loop and the rest of the protein. These simulations correctly predicted a small free energy difference between the cis and trans forms composed of larger, compensating differences in enthalpy and entropy. The structural predictions of these simulations were qualitatively consistent with known X-ray structures of nuclease variants and yield a model of the unknown minor trans conformation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (10.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson A. G., Hermans J. Microfolding: conformational probability map for the alanine dipeptide in water from molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins. 1988;3(4):262–265. doi: 10.1002/prot.340030408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beveridge D. L., DiCapua F. M. Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:431–492. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruccoleri R. E., Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers. 1987 Jan;26(1):137–168. doi: 10.1002/bip.360260114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlacci L., Englander S. W. The loop problem in proteins: a Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach. Biopolymers. 1993 Aug;33(8):1271–1286. doi: 10.1002/bip.360330812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cotton F. A., Hazen E. E., Jr, Legg M. J. Staphylococcal nuclease: proposed mechanism of action based on structure of enzyme-thymidine 3',5'-bisphosphate-calcium ion complex at 1.5-A resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jun;76(6):2551–2555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ech-Cherif el-Kettani M. A., Durup J. Theoretical determination of conformational paths in citrate synthase. Biopolymers. 1992 May;32(5):561–574. doi: 10.1002/bip.360320512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans P. A., Kautz R. A., Fox R. O., Dobson C. M. A magnetization-transfer nuclear magnetic resonance study of the folding of staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 1989 Jan 10;28(1):362–370. doi: 10.1021/bi00427a050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fox R. O., Evans P. A., Dobson C. M. Multiple conformations of a protein demonstrated by magnetization transfer NMR spectroscopy. Nature. 1986 Mar 13;320(6058):192–194. doi: 10.1038/320192a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frauenfelder H., Sligar S. G., Wolynes P. G. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science. 1991 Dec 13;254(5038):1598–1603. doi: 10.1126/science.1749933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gordon H. L., Somorjai R. L. Fuzzy cluster analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Proteins. 1992 Oct;14(2):249–264. doi: 10.1002/prot.340140211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harvey S. C., Gabb H. A. Conformational transitions using molecular dynamics with minimum biasing. Biopolymers. 1993 Aug;33(8):1167–1172. doi: 10.1002/bip.360330803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haydock C., Sharp J. C., Prendergast F. G. Tryptophan-47 rotational isomerization in variant-3 scorpion neurotoxin. A combination thermodynamic perturbation and umbrella sampling study. Biophys J. 1990 Jun;57(6):1269–1279. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82645-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hermans J., Anderson A. G., Yun R. H. Differential helix propensity of small apolar side chains studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry. 1992 Jun 23;31(24):5646–5653. doi: 10.1021/bi00139a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hodel A., Kautz R. A., Adelman D. M., Fox R. O. The importance of anchorage in determining a strained protein loop conformation. Protein Sci. 1994 Apr;3(4):549–556. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560030403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodel A., Kautz R. A., Fox R. O. Stabilization of a strained protein loop conformation through protein engineering. Protein Sci. 1995 Mar;4(3):484–495. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hynes T. R., Fox R. O. The crystal structure of staphylococcal nuclease refined at 1.7 A resolution. Proteins. 1991;10(2):92–105. doi: 10.1002/prot.340100203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karpen M. E., de Haseth P. L., Neet K. E. Comparing short protein substructures by a method based on backbone torsion angles. Proteins. 1989;6(2):155–167. doi: 10.1002/prot.340060206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loll P. J., Lattman E. E. The crystal structure of the ternary complex of staphylococcal nuclease, Ca2+, and the inhibitor pdTp, refined at 1.65 A. Proteins. 1989;5(3):183–201. doi: 10.1002/prot.340050302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simonson T., Perahia D. Internal and interfacial dielectric properties of cytochrome c from molecular dynamics in aqueous solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 14;92(4):1082–1086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Swaminathan S., Ravishanker G., Beveridge D. L., Lavery R., Etchebest C., Sklenar H. Conformational and helicoidal analysis of the molecular dynamics of proteins: "curves," dials and windows for a 50 psec dynamic trajectory of BPTI. Proteins. 1990;8(2):179–193. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES