Table 2.
Phylogenetic hypothesis, H | Sequence, R | Likelihood model | LnLi value | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|
ML clam | Clam | L(HC|RC) | −3344.15 | — |
ML bacteria | Bacteria | L(HB|RB) | −2808.31 | — |
Ho: clam and bacterial tree topologies were not different | ||||
Bacterial tree topology | Clam | L(HMB|RC) | −3346.68 | 7.31 |
Clam tree topology | Bacteria | L(HMC|RB) | −2809.78 | 2.17 |
Ho: Phylogenies do not differ from expectations of a constant molecular clock | ||||
Clock-like clam phylogeny | Clam | L(HMKC|RC) | −3349.69 | 3.16 |
Clock-like bacterial phylogeny | Bacteria | L(HMKB|RB) | −2816.83 | 3.86* |
The model L(H|R) is read as the likelihood of hypothesis H given sequence data R, with the following subscripts: (C) clam; (B) bacteria; (M) maximum likelihood topology; and (MK) clock-like maximum likelihood phylogeny. The estimated standard deviation (S.D.) was obtained by the Kishino-Hasegawa method (32).
Significantly different from the appropriate ML comparison (α = 0.05).