Skip to main content
PMC home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 2000 Aug;9(8):1559–1566. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.8.1559

Static light scattering studies of OmpF porin: implications for integral membrane protein crystallization.

C Hitscherich Jr 1, J Kaplan 1, M Allaman 1, J Wiencek 1, P J Loll 1
PMCID: PMC2144733  PMID: 10975577

Abstract

Integral membrane proteins carry out some of the most important functions of living cells, yet relatively few details are known about their structures. This is due, in large part, to the difficulties associated with preparing membrane protein crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. Mechanistic studies of membrane protein crystallization may provide insights that will aid in determining future membrane protein structures. Accordingly, the solution behavior of the bacterial outer membrane protein OmpF porin was studied by static light scattering under conditions favorable for crystal growth. The second osmotic virial coefficient (B22) was found to be a predictor of the crystallization behavior of porin, as has previously been found for soluble proteins. Both tetragonal and trigonal porin crystals were found to form only within a narrow window of B22 values located at approximately -0.5 to -2 X 10(-4) mol mL g(-2), which is similar to the "crystallization slot" observed for soluble proteins. The B22 behavior of protein-free detergent micelles proved very similar to that of porin-detergent complexes, suggesting that the detergent's contribution dominates the behavior of protein-detergent complexes under crystallizing conditions. This observation implies that, for any given detergent, it may be possible to construct membrane protein crystallization screens of general utility by manipulating the solution properties so as to drive detergent B22 values into the crystallization slot. Such screens would limit the screening effort to the detergent systems most likely to yield crystals, thereby minimizing protein requirements and improving productivity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (233.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Garavito R. M., Picot D., Loll P. J. Strategies for crystallizing membrane proteins. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996 Feb;28(1):13–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garavito R. M., Rosenbusch J. P. Isolation and crystallization of bacterial porin. Methods Enzymol. 1986;125:309–328. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(86)25027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. George A., Wilson W. W. Predicting protein crystallization from a dilute solution property. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994 Jul 1;50(Pt 4):361–365. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994001216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayashi Y., Matsui H., Takagi T. Membrane protein molecular weight determined by low-angle laser light-scattering photometry coupled with high-performance gel chromatography. Methods Enzymol. 1989;172:514–528. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(89)72031-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Inokuchi K., Mutoh N., Matsuyama S., Mizushima S. Primary structure of the ompF gene that codes for a major outer membrane protein of Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 11;10(21):6957–6968. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.21.6957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Misra R., Reeves P. R. Role of micF in the tolC-mediated regulation of OmpF, a major outer membrane protein of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1987 Oct;169(10):4722–4730. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.10.4722-4730.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pauptit R. A., Zhang H., Rummel G., Schirmer T., Jansonius J. N., Rosenbusch J. P. Trigonal crystals of porin from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1991 Apr 5;218(3):505–507. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90696-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pebay-Peyroula E., Garavito R. M., Rosenbusch J. P., Zulauf M., Timmins P. A. Detergent structure in tetragonal crystals of OmpF porin. Structure. 1995 Oct 15;3(10):1051–1059. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00241-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosenbusch J. P. Characterization of the major envelope protein from Escherichia coli. Regular arrangement on the peptidoglycan and unusual dodecyl sulfate binding. J Biol Chem. 1974 Dec 25;249(24):8019–8029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenbusch J. P. The critical role of detergents in the crystallization of membrane proteins. J Struct Biol. 1990 Jul-Sep;104(1-3):134–138. doi: 10.1016/1047-8477(90)90068-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roth M., Arnoux B., Ducruix A., Reiss-Husson F. Structure of the detergent phase and protein-detergent interactions in crystals of the wild-type (strain Y) Rhodobacter sphaeroides photochemical reaction center. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 1;30(39):9403–9413. doi: 10.1021/bi00103a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takagi T., Miyake J., Nashima T. Assessment study on the use of the low angle laser light scattering technique for the estimation of molecular weight of the polypeptide forming a complex with sodium dodecyl sulfate. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Nov 20;626(1):5–14. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Terwilliger T. C., Waldo G., Peat T. S., Newman J. M., Chu K., Berendzen J. Class-directed structure determination: foundation for a protein structure initiative. Protein Sci. 1998 Sep;7(9):1851–1856. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wallin E., von Heijne G. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms. Protein Sci. 1998 Apr;7(4):1029–1038. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES