Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006 Nov 9;31(3):315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.09.007

Table 5.

Relationships between major ADOS domain scores and BDS, STROOP, and COWAT test scores in the full mutation males and females separately and combined. Regression coefficients (β) and P-values (p) were estimated using simple models, but changes in p-values from complex models are also indicated (as specified below).

BDS STROOP COWATT COWATA
ADOS Regression coefficient (Β) p Regression coefficient (β) p Regression coefficient (β) p Regression coefficient (β) p
COM
All −0.147 < 0.001 −0.016* 0.556 −0.079* < 0.001 −0.080* < 0.001
Female −0.129* 0.002 −0.022* 0.338 −0.076* 0.001 −0.133 < 0.001
Male −0.294 0.012 −0.017 0.726 −0.078 0.007 0.004 0.887
RSI
All −0.089* < 0.001 −0.014* 0.507 −0.038* < 0.001 −0.051* 0.001
Female −0.088* 0.050 −0.023* 0.378 −0.035* 0.056 −0.058* 0.018
Male −0.105 0.001 0.002** 0.954 −0.041* 0.077 0.019* 0.317
CSIT
All −0.099* < 0.001 −0.013* 0.493 −0.047* < 0.001 −0.059* < 0.001
Female −0.098* 0.018 −0.022* 0.383 −0.043* 0.011 −0.065* 0.003
Male −0.130 < 0.001 −0.002** 0.955 −0.052* 0.010 0.015* 0.440

Adjusted for * FSIQ or ** age, in complex models, with changes in p values after adjustment indicated as follows:

Underlined are p values remaining or becoming significant (< 0.05); bold are p values remaining or becoming insignificant (> 0.05).