Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 1;66(17):8878–8886. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1450

Table 1.

Comparison of expression of MART-HH and MART-HM

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
MART-HH 21.1 ± 5.3 (17.4) 4.2 ± 2.1 (12.7) 2.6 ± 1.4 (9.6)
MART-HM 61 ± 7 (40.2) 40 ± 10.4 (21.7) 20 ± 5.1 (11.5)
No. experiments 12 5 5
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

NOTE: Human PBLs were electroporated with either MART-HH or MART-HM and stained at the indicated day with MART-1 tetramer. The average ± SD of the percentage of positive cells as well as the average MFI (%) are shown at days 1 to 3 after electroporation. We also indicate the number of independent experiments done and the statistical significance of the difference between MART-HH and MART-HM staining based on a Student’s t test.