TABLE 1.
Linkage group | Corresponding chromosome in JEC21 | No. of markers | Length (cM) | Physical distance covered by markers (kb) | Ratio between physical distance and genetic distance (kb/cM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 13 | 38.5 | 2135 | 55.45 |
2 | 2 | 9 | 12.5 | 1401 | 112.08 |
3 | 3 | 11 | 11.8 | 1604a | 195.61b |
4 | 4 | 11 | 32.3 | 1612 | 49.91 |
5 | 5 | 9 | 13.9 | 1144 | 82.30 |
6 | 6 | 7 | 12.6 | 1307 | 103.73 |
7 | 7 | 12 | 11.5 | 1266 | 110.09 |
8 | 8 and 12 | 10 | 22.2 | NCc | NCc |
9 | 9 | 7 | 9.1 | 1146 | 125.93 |
10 | 10 | 7 | 7.4 | 986 | 133.24 |
11 | 11 | 8 | 13.6 | 948 | 69.71 |
12 | 13 | 6 | 8.3 | 722 | 86.99 |
13 | 14 | 2 | 2.2 | 177 | 80.45 |
14 | 14 | 2 | 0.9 | 102 | 113.33 |
Total | 114 | 196.8 |
Marker CNC07180 was not included, because it was identified as a translocation (see results).
Genetic distance involving marker CNC07180 was not included (see reason above). Therefore, a genetic distance of 8.2, not 11.8, was used to calculate the ratio.
Not calculated, because markers in LG 8 were located on two different chromosomes in JEC21.