Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov 28;104(49):19363–19368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708072104

Table 1.

Divergence times and standard errors (in Mya) for deep-level angiosperm nodes as estimated by PL analyses

Node Unconstrained Stem eud, 125 Mya Crown eud, 125 Mya
Angiosperms 169.6 (3.79) 169.7 (3.46) 169.8 (3.46)
Nymph + Ill + mesangiosperms 163.3 (2.68) 163.5 (2.63) 163.5 (2.63)
Illicium + mesangiosperms 154.7 (2.47) 154.8 (2.53) 154.9 (2.53)
Mesangiosperms 143.8 (2.45) 143.9 (2.67) 144.0 (2.66)
Chloranthus + magnoliids 140.3 (2.43) 140.4 (2.54) 140.5 (2.54)
Magnoliids 130.1 (2.24) 130.3 (2.20) 130.3 (2.20)
Cerato + eud + mono 143.1 (2.99) 143.1 (3.18) 143.0 (2.97)
Monocots 128.9 (2.50) 129.2 (2.69) 129.1 (2.69)
Cerato + eud 141.3 (2.72) 141.4 (2.97) 141.4 (3.18)
Eudicots 124.8 (3.2) 124.9 (3.43) 125.0 (3.43)

The first column gives results of the unconstrained analysis; the second and third columns give results when the minimum age of stem group or crown group eudicots is constrained to be 125 Mya. Standard errors are given in parentheses. Cerato, Ceratophyllum; eud, eudicots; mono, monocots; Ill, Illicium; Nymph, Nymphaeales.