. 2007 Dec 3;104(50):19885–19890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706568104

Table 2.

Results of wolverine analyses using different spatial resolutions and genetic distance metrics

Spatial distance metric	Genetic distance metric
Spatial distance metric	F_ST /(1 − F_ST)	D_LR	D_S
Resistance distance (5-km cell size)	0.68	0.70	0.75
Resistance distance (50-km cell size)	0.71	0.73	0.77
Log₁₀ (geographic distance)	0.24	0.24	0.28
Least-cost distance	0.37	0.37	0.43

Table entries are R² values. The resistance distance was superior to geographic and least-cost distances in all cases.