Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Graph Model. 2007 Jul 14;26(4):800–812. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.07.003

Table 2.

Computational alanine-scanning results for adenine/rMrgA (energies in kcal/mol).

I.E.(WT)a ΔI.E.(Ala)a
Asn88 −17.787 17.161 41%
Asn146 −12.819 12.275 29%
Met92 −4.741 2.844 7%
Phe83 −1.545 1.433 3%
His225 −1.505 1.349 3%
Leu174 −0.665 0.432 1%
Tyr95 −0.422 0.344 0.8%
Ile96 −0.450 0.333 0.8%
Phe178 −0.298 0.265 0.6%
Cys150 −0.494 0.207 0.5%
Thr170 −0.273 0.168 0.4%
Met91 −0.321 0.161 0.4%
Arg147 −0.360 0.091 0.2%
Pro85 −0.393 0.086 0.2%
Leu177 −0.102 0.066 0.2%
a

The intermolecular interaction energy (IE) for the wild type (WT, no mutation) is shown for all residues within 5 Å of the ligand. After mutating the residue to Ala and minimizing, we recalculated the IE of the ligand to this Ala, IE(Ala).

b

The percentage change in binding of the mutant relative to the calculated total binding of WT is shown in the last column.