Table 2.
Computational alanine-scanning results for adenine/rMrgA (energies in kcal/mol).
I.E.(WT)a | ΔI.E.(Ala)a | ||
---|---|---|---|
Asn88 | −17.787 | 17.161 | 41% |
Asn146 | −12.819 | 12.275 | 29% |
Met92 | −4.741 | 2.844 | 7% |
Phe83 | −1.545 | 1.433 | 3% |
His225 | −1.505 | 1.349 | 3% |
Leu174 | −0.665 | 0.432 | 1% |
Tyr95 | −0.422 | 0.344 | 0.8% |
Ile96 | −0.450 | 0.333 | 0.8% |
Phe178 | −0.298 | 0.265 | 0.6% |
Cys150 | −0.494 | 0.207 | 0.5% |
Thr170 | −0.273 | 0.168 | 0.4% |
Met91 | −0.321 | 0.161 | 0.4% |
Arg147 | −0.360 | 0.091 | 0.2% |
Pro85 | −0.393 | 0.086 | 0.2% |
Leu177 | −0.102 | 0.066 | 0.2% |
The intermolecular interaction energy (IE) for the wild type (WT, no mutation) is shown for all residues within 5 Å of the ligand. After mutating the residue to Ala and minimizing, we recalculated the IE of the ligand to this Ala, IE(Ala).
The percentage change in binding of the mutant relative to the calculated total binding of WT is shown in the last column.