Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;128(3):347–364. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609579

TABLE I.

Parameters of bbTBA Blockade

Macroscopic Microscopic
Kd vs. V Frac. block Kinetics Steady state FINAL MODEL
(Fig. 1 C) (Fig. 8 C) (Fig. 5) (Fig. 5 C)
Kd(0 mV) μM 9.5 8.3, 8.1, 10.1a 5.5 4.8 8–10
zδ total 0.15 0.13, 0.16, 0.17a 0.11 0.14 0.15
kON(0 mV)
    M−1 s−1
1 × 108 0.625 × 108
ON 0.05 0.05
kOFF(0 mV)
    s−1
562 562
OFF 0.07 0.1

The dissociation constant (Kd) reflects the concentration of bbTBA required for half-maximal blockade. The charge carried by bbTBA (z = +1) multiplied by the total electrical distance δ together give zδtotal, an estimate of the total voltage dependence of block. The second order association rate for block at 0 mV (kON (0 mV)) and the charge associated with blocker binding zδON, as well as the rate and voltage dependence of blocker dissociation (kOFF (0 mV) and zδOFF), were calculated from microscopic kinetic measurements as described in Figs. 4 and 5. Macroscopic Kd and zδ were obtained from fitting Kd values (obtained from Hill fits) plotted as a function of voltage (Fig. 1 C) with Eq. 2, or fitting fractional unblock plotted as a function of voltage (Fig. 8 C) to Eq. 3. Microscopic Kd and zδ were measured from fits to Eq. 2 of Kd vs. voltage relationships (Fig. 5 C), where Kd was obtained from either kinetic measurements (Fig. 4 C) or steady state Po (Fig. 4 D). Blocker rates and associated zδ values were obtained from fitting plots of either the on or off rates from dwell time histograms vs. voltage (Fig. 5, A and B) with Eq. 2. A final model was constructed that describes all measurements in this study; this model was used in modeling block (Figs. 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 11; see Materials and methods).

a

Values given are for low, medium, and high Po data sets, respectively.