Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 25;11(1):R11. doi: 10.1186/cc5671

Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity of peroneal CMAP reduction to diagnose critical illness myopathy and/or neuropathy

Time of development Sensitivity Specificity
ICU day (True-positive rate) (True-negative rate)

Number (%) Median (IQR)

1. One peroneal CMAP reduced according to criterion A 64 (69.6) 3 (2–5) 28/28 = 100% 28/64 = 44%
2. One peroneal CMAP reduced according to criterion B 49 (53.3) 4 (2–7) 28/28 = 100% 43/64 = 67%
3. Both peroneal CMAPs reduced according to criterion A 26 (28.3) 6 (3–10) 21/28 = 75% 59/64 = 92%
4. One peroneal CMAP reduced according to criterion A plus the
contralateral peroneal CMAP reduced according to criterion B
23 (25.0) 6 (3–10) 21/28 = 75% 62/64 = 97%
5. Both peroneal CMAPs reduced according to criterion B 16 (17.4) 6 (3.5–10) 16/28 = 57% 64/64 = 100%

Criterion A = CMAP amplitude reduced by more than 25% of its initial value (at ICU admission) but less than two standard deviations (SDs) of its normal value. Criterion B = CMAP reduced by more than 2 SDs of its normal value. Note that the five categories are not mutually exclusive (for example, the 16 patients in category 5 are also included in category 2). CMAP, compound muscle action potential; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range.