Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 12;104(51):20220–20225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707051104

Table 3.

Mean cuspal enamel thickness in modern human and Neanderthal mesial molar cusps

Tooth* Cusp Human N Neanderthal§ N % Diff
UM1 mb 1,069 ± 169 13 759 2 71.0
mp 1,521 ± 271 14 954 2 62.7
UM2 mb 1,322 ± 182 23 1197 3 90.5
mp 1,688 ± 188 17 1293 2 76.6
UM3 mb 1,594 ± 276 68 1338 5 83.9
mp 1,855 ± 246 55 1455 5 78.4
LM1 mb 1,093 ± 245 20 866 6 79.2
ml 1,061 ± 194 27 901 6 84.9
LM2 mb 1,452 ± 148 32 1060 1 73.0
ml 1,209 ± 130 25 971 2 80.3
LM3 mb 1,618 ± 247 43 1006 3 62.2
ml 1,342 ± 235 30 954 6 71.1

*U, maxillary; L, mandibular; M1, first molar; M2, second molar; M3, third molar.

For maxillary molar cusps: mb, mesiobuccal cusp (paracone); mp, mesiopalatal cusp (protocone); for mandibular molar cusps: mb, mesiobuccal cusp (protoconid); ml, mesiolingual cusp (metaconid).

Modern human values were taken from physical sections of mesial cusps of a sample of modern humans (mixed global populations) reported in ref. 34. Thickness measured in micrometers.

§Neanderthal values were taken from virtual sections cut through the mesial cusps of unworn or very lightly worn cusps of molars reported in ref. 37. Thickness measured in micrometers.

The percent difference was defined as the Neanderthal mean divided by the human mean, multiplied by 100.