Skip to main content
. 2007 Nov;14(11):751–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00865.x

Table 6.

(a) The incremental costs, benefits and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for treatment alternatives in comparison with 1-year course of lamivudine of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB); (b) The ICERs for treatment alternatives in comparison with 1-year course of lamivudine of HBeAg-negative CHB

Treatment alternatives Cost (S$) Life year gained QALY Cost per Life Year gained (S$/LY) Cost per QALY gained (S$/QALY)
(a)
IFN 4570.91 −0.050 −0.209 nv nv
PEG-IFN (1 year) 16 968.32 0.242 0.251 70 161.69 67 540.78
Adefovir (1 year) 735.09 −0.048 −0.020 nv nv
Lamivudine (5 years) 5783.60 0.320 0.313 18 073.04 18 507.18
Adefovir (5 years) 8989.51 0.414 0.422 21 689.93 21 313.88
Lamivudine + adefovir as rescue (5 years) 6207.56 0.548 0.535 11 319.95 11 604.85
Adefovir + lamivudine as rescue (5 years) 8597.43 0.481 0.494 17 864.69 17 403.02
(b)
PEG-IFN (1 year) 17 856.93 0.017 −0.082 1 065 894.63 nv
Adefovir (1 year) 934.59 −0.109 −0.097 nv nv
Lamivudine (5 years) 8878.72 0.508 0.509 17 461.19 17 453.01
Adefovir (5 years) 11 542.99 1.106 1.097 10 439.73 10 524.11
Lamivudine + Adefovir as rescue (5 years) 8822.34 1.213 1.172 7271.76 7528.61
Adefovir + Lamivudine as rescue (5 years) 11 183.36 1.262 1.248 8861.37 8960.64

nv, alternative treatments dominated by 1-year course of lamivudine (i.e. better outcomes achieved at lower costs when lamivudine is used).