Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 26;14(11):1505–1514. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00145-07

TABLE 1.

Summary of patient sera used in this studya

Panel (n)b Diagnosisc No. of samples
Virus infectedd Serology
All negativeg
IgMe HIf
1 (80)h Confirmed DEN 30 42 43 8
2 (82) Confirmed DEN 18 60 54 0
3 (39)h Confirmed non-DEN 0 0 0 39
a

Both acute-phase (early symptomatic phase) as well as convalescent-phase (1 to 2 weeks later) samples were collected; the data shown are for the acute-phase sera. (For details, see the supplemental material.)

b

Eighty patients for whom paired acute- and convalescent-phase sera could be collected were placed in panel 1. Eighty-two DEN virus infection-confirmed patients for whom single acute-phase sera were available were assigned to panel 2. Panel 3 consisted of 39 acute-phase febrile patients confirmed to be non-DEN cases. Of these, paired sera were available from 8 patients, while single acute-phase samples were collected from the remaining 31.

c

Based on the presence of DEN virus RNA and/or a positive IgM and/or HI test in conjunction with clinical presentation.

d

DEN virus RNA in sera was detected by RT-PCR; infectious virus could be isolated successfully from several RT-PCR-positive sera.

e

Anti-DEN virus IgM antibodies were detected using a commercial MAC-ELISA kit (Focus Diagnostics).

f

Laboratory confirmation of DEN infection was defined by positive detection of a ≥4-fold rise in anti-DEN virus IgG antibody titers in paired sera; HI titers of <20 were identified as non-DEN cases.

g

Sera that tested negative by RT-PCR, virus isolation, MAC-ELISA, and HI assay.

h

Convalescent-phase sera were obtained (1 to 2 weeks after collection of acute-phase sera) from all 80 patients in panel 1 and from 8 patients in panel 3. All panel 1 convalescent-phase sera were IgM+ HI+, while all 8 convalescent-phase panel 3 sera were IgM HI.