Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 5;45(11):3631–3640. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00280-07

TABLE 4.

Performance of multiplex nested PCR assays compared to conventional methods

Organism No. (%) of positive specimens (n = 303)
Multiplex nested PCR Virus isolation IFA
Any infection 147 (48.5) 61 (20.1) 41 (13.5)
Single infection 140 (46.2) 61 (20.1) 41 (13.5)
    Influenza A virus 19 (6.3) 15 (5.0) 11 (3.6)
    Influenza A virus H1 17 (5.6) a a
    Influenza A virus H3 2 (0.7) a a
    Influenza A virus H5 0 a a
    Influenza B virus 10 (3.3) 9 (3.0) 7 (2.3)
    PIV-1 19 (6.3) 14 (4.6) 10 (3.3)
    PIV-2 6 (2.0) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
    PIV-3 3 (1.0) 2 (0.7) 1 (0.3)
    PIV-4 2 (0.7) a a
    Respiratory syncytial virus 8 (2.7) 5 (1.7) 6 (1.9)
    Respiratory syncytial virus group A 5 (1.7) a a
    Respiratory syncytial virus group B 3 (1.0) a a
    Rhinovirus 16 (5.3) a a
    Enteroviruses 3 (1.0) 0 0
    HCoV-OC43 16 (5.3) a a
    HCoV-229E 3 (1.0) a a
    SARS-CoV 0 0 0
    hMPV 15 (5.0) a a
    M. pneumoniae 5 (1.7) a a
    L. pneumophila 0 a a
    C. pneumoniae 0 a a
    ADVs 15 (5.0) 15 (5.0) 5 (1.7)
Coinfection 7 (2.3) 0 0
    Influenza A virus and M. pneumoniae 1 (0.3) a a
    Influenza A virus H1 and C. pneumoniae 1 (0.3) a a
    Influenza A virus H3 and HCoV-229E 1 (0.3) a a
    Influenza A virus H3 and PIV-2 1 (0.3) b b
    hMPV and M. pneumoniae 2 (0.7) a a
    hMPV and PIV-4 1 (0.3) a a
a

Organisms not isolated/differentiated by virus isolation.

b

PIV-2 was isolated.