Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1997 Oct;63(4):483–489. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.4.483

Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect

N Beschin 1, R Cubelli 1, S Della 1, L Spinazzola 1
PMCID: PMC2169750  PMID: 9343128

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Egocentric coordinate systems centred on the trunk, head, and gaze have been investigated in a patient who displays severe extrapersonal neglect and in five control subjects.
METHODS—The subjects were tested with a blind tactile exploration task in five different experimental conditions in which the role of the three distinct frames of reference was individually controlled.
RESULTS—Only the trunk centred coordinates significantly influenced the performance of the patient, therefore proving of paramount importance in determining the boundaries of the neglected field. Similar results emerged from a single word reading task, in which the patient's performance improved when the stimuli were presented to the right of his body's midline.
CONCLUSION—These findings point to the importance of the body centred coordinate system in determining the area of extrapersonal spatial neglect.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert M. L. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology. 1973 Jun;23(6):658–664. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.6.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arguin M., Bub D. N. Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect. Cortex. 1993 Jun;29(2):349–357. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80188-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beschin N., Cazzani M., Cubelli R., Della Sala S., Spinazzola L. Ignoring left and far: an investigation of tactile neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Jan;34(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisiach E., Capitani E., Porta E. Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: evidence from unilateral neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;48(2):141–144. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.2.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calvanio R., Petrone P. N., Levine D. N. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered. Neurology. 1987 Jul;37(7):1179–1183. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.7.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):267–269. doi: 10.1038/346267a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chokron S., Imbert M. Variations of the egocentric reference among normal subjects and a patient with unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jun;33(6):703–711. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00007-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Colombo A., De Renzi E., Faglioni P. The occurrence of visual neglect in patients with unilateral cerebral disease. Cortex. 1976 Sep;12(3):221–231. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(76)80003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cubelli R., Pugliese M., Gabellini A. S. The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task. J Neurol. 1994 Oct;241(10):611–614. doi: 10.1007/BF00920625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Renzi E., Faglioni P., Scotti G. Hemispheric contribution to exploration of space through the visual and tactile modality. Cortex. 1970 Jun;6(2):191–203. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(70)80027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Della Sala S., Laiacona M., Spinnler H., Ubezio C. A cancellation test: its reliability in assessing attentional deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Psychol Med. 1992 Nov;22(4):885–901. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700038460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Farah M. J., Brunn J. L., Wong A. B., Wallace M. A., Carpenter P. A. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(4):335–347. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C. Lateral and radial neglect as a function of spatial position: a case study. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Dec;33(12):1697–1702. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Husain M. Is visual neglect body-centric? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;58(2):262–263. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.2.262-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeannerod M., Biguer B. Référence égocentrique et espace représenté. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1989;145(8-9):635–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karnath H. O., Christ K., Hartje W. Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain. 1993 Apr;116(Pt 2):383–396. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karnath H. O., Schenkel P., Fischer B. Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain. 1991 Aug;114(Pt 4):1997–2014. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.4.1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kooistra C. A., Heilman K. M. Hemispatial visual inattention masquerading as hemianopia. Neurology. 1989 Aug;39(8):1125–1127. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.8.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ladavas E. Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? Brain. 1987 Feb;110(Pt 1):167–180. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Massironi M., Antonucci G., Pizzamiglio L., Vitale M. V., Zoccolotti P. The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention. Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(1):161–166. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mennemeier M., Chatterjee A., Heilman K. M. A comparison of the influences of body and environment centred reference frames on neglect. Brain. 1994 Oct;117(Pt 5):1013–1021. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.5.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nichelli P., Rinaldi M., Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn. 1989 Jan;9(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pardo J. V., Fox P. T., Raichle M. E. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 1991 Jan 3;349(6304):61–64. doi: 10.1038/349061a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Robertson L. C. Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: orientation priming and visual field differences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Aug;21(4):707–718. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Young A. W., Hellawell D. J., Welch J. Neglect and visual recognition. Brain. 1992 Feb;115(Pt 1):51–71. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES